Search results

Warmer temperatures this week have provided suitable environmental conditions for dollar spot (Sclerotinia homoeoecarpa) development on fairways. We are now beginning to see a late season surge in damage as we enter the autumn months. Thinking back to the beginning of the 2010 season, we set out to investigate the effectiveness of early season dollar spot programs and if you look (Figure 1) we are able to see the progression of the disease at a variety of different locations surrounding Chicago. So I ask, was it worth it to spray early in April-May? At our locations for this year’s Biorational study, ranging from North Shore Country Club in Glenview, IL Coyote Run Golf Course in Flossmor, IL and Briar Ridge CC in northwest Indiana, it is evident that the disease failed to take off until the middle of summer.
 

As an additional note: each of our locations vary in turfgrass composition with Coyote Run having a blend of Southshore and L93, Briar Ridge CC with Penncross and North Shore CC having a mix of creeping bentgrass and Poa annua. We tested seven treatments, Rhapsody 10 fl oz, Ecoguard 20 fl oz, Dew Cure 4.0 fl oz, Urea 0.15 lbs, Daconil 3.2 oz, Daconil 3.2 oz curative (as needed using 5% damage threshold).

Treatments are being applied at 14 day intervals at label rates and the plots at all locations are scouted weekly. If disease infection centers exceed an average of 5% area affected a curative application of 3.2 oz of Daconil is applied over the biorational treatment. We are able to understand the effectiveness of the different treatments by comparing visual quality, percentage of disease, and number of curative fungicide applications. Our goal is to reduce fungicide use and maintain turfgrass quality at levels required for fairways.

Results (Table 1). At Coyote Run GC, we have been able to maintain the Dew Cure treatment below the 5% threshold without applying a single curative application of Daconil! At this location we were also able to see a recuperative effect within the Urea treatment, only requiring a single application. At North Shore Country Club we were able to reduce the curative applications by two when using DewCure. All other plots required the same amount of curatives, four apps. At Briar Ridge with DewCure, we were able to reduce the number of curative required by one. At Briar Ridge we did observe phytotoxicity by DewCure. On August 10 an application of all products were made at a time when temperatures were 90+ degrees and turf was entering drought stress. This resulted in severe injury by DewCure alone.

These biorational products may play more important roles in disease management programs as we continue to progress into a reduced input future. As we continue to learn and understand the benefits and limitations, superintendents will be able to make better and more informed decisions. We may as well investigate alternatives now before we run out of options.

The final picture shows a plot treated with Dew Cure resisting dollar spot without receiving any curative applications during the summer of 2010 at Coyote Run GC.

Tim Sibicky
TSibicky@cdga.org
Chicago District Golf Association
11855 Archer Avenue
Lemont, IL 60439

This is the first of the 2011 research reports. It includes the 2010 results from our trial on creeping bentgrasses maintained at both fairway and green height. Tables 3 and 4 are jpg photos and you will need to click on them to be able to read them.

Creeping Bentgrass Dollar Spot Study

Christopher J. Blume and Nick E. Christians

Objectives

The objectives of this study are to determine the susceptibility of creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera) cultivars to dollar spot (Sclerotinia homeocarpa) under both green height and fairway height.

Materials and Methods

This fairway height (0.5”) and green height (0.25”) studies are being conducted at the Iowa State University Turfgrass Research Station it is part of a regional project being conducted at several of the Midwestern Universities. Both studies included 24 cultivars, although some of the cultivars differed on the two sites (Table 1). The green-height study area was established on a sand-capped area, and the fairway-height area was established on a native soil area (Nicollet clay-loam).

Both studies were established 17 September, 2008. The plots were allowed to mature until the spring of 2009. The plots were then split into untreated and fungicide treated halves. The study was conducted as a randomized split block design, with three replications.

Fungicide treatment timing was based on the cultivar ‘Declaration’, which is the most dollar spot tolerant cultivar in the study. Treatments were made to the green height plots when ‘Declaration’ was observed to have at least 5% of the plot area infested with dollar spot. The fairway height study area was treated when ‘Declaration’ was observed to have at least 10% of the plot area infested.

The fungicide mixture consisted of Emerald (0.18 oz product/1000ft²) and Daconil Ultrex (3.2 oz product/1000ft²), applied in 2 gallons water/1000ft². The applications were applied using a modified spray boom, with two TeeJet XR flat fan nozzles. In 2010, three applications were made 24 June, 19 August, and 4 October.

Results

‘Memorial’ and ‘Penncross’, and ‘LS-44’ had the best quality ratings in the green height study in 2010, whereas ‘Allister’ received the lowest rating. In the fairway height study, ‘Alpha’, ‘LS-44’, and ‘Memorial’ were the highest rated cultivars, and ‘Independence’, ‘Declaration’ and ‘SR 1150’ received the lowest quality ratings (Table 2).

‘Century’ and ‘Imperial’ showed the most damage from dollar spot in both September and October in the green height study (Table 3). ‘Memorial’, ‘Declaration’, and ‘Crystal Bluelinks’ had the least damage in untreated plots at the end of the season.

There was not as much dollar spot in 2010 as there was in 2009 on the fairway height bentgrass. At the first two ratings of the season, there was more dollar spot in the treated side than in the untreated side of the plot. These plots had not been treated since the fall before. The reason for this observation is unknown. In August, no dollar spot was observed on treated or on untreated sides of the plot. In September, ‘Southshore’ and ‘Century’ had the most dollar spot on the untreated side of the plots, whereas ‘Memorial’, ‘Independence’, and ‘Declaration’ had the least dollar spot. In October, ‘Crenshaw’ and ‘Century’ had the most dollar spot and ‘Memorial’, ‘Alister’, ‘Pennlinks II’ and ‘Memorial’ had the least (Table 4).

The following is a post from a student named Steve Johnson. He is an undergraduate who was working for Dr. Mark Gleason on a pathology research project this summer. He is doing this as part of the requirement for his Hort 391 special studies course. Hopefully, this will start a trend and we will have several other posts like it this fall.

Steve Johnson, Soph. Summer Intern Blog #1

Many turfgrasses are susceptible to fungal diseases and this leads to many maintenance issues for turf practitioners.  In response to the detrimental effects of turf diseases caused by a wide assortment of fungi, a precise reading of the amount of turf infected by a disease is needed to determine the proper course of action.

In evaluating alternatives for suppressing turf diseases, its important to have a method to separate the effective treatments and the from the less effective ones.  This often requires replicated field trials, often at multiple sites, comparing each alternative in the same turfgrass stand.  But how, exactly, does one measure disease severity.

Disease severity is usually measured by some sort of visual estimation method.  In other words, you look at the turf that was treated with each respective fungicide treatment and try to visually estimate a number a represents how severe the disease symptoms appear.  This is not always accurate and may not be consistent from one rating to the next or from person to person.

As an example of this, lets consider the turf disease dollar spot, caused by the fungus Sclerotinia homeocarpa. Dollar spot is a relentless disease that is recognized by it distinctive lesions that are often the size of the a silver dollar and the lesions can grow together in severe cases.  Dollar spot is the most expensive disease to control on golf courses across much of the Midwest and Eastern United States.

In comparing dollar spot fungicide treatments to each other, how can we measure disease severity?  One way is to estimate the percentage of the plot that has turned brown due to the disease.  But one person rating the percentage of dollar spot may come up with a different number than someone else.  Others have two people rate the same plot independently of each other.  So how can we be sure that the disease ratings are consistent and reliable? 

Evaluating a way to accurately estimate dollar spot severity on greens-height creeping bentgrass was the objective of this study.  We wanted to find out how different two people would rate the same turf plots, and then average the ratings to reduce bias from individual ratings.  A trial was conducted during the summer of 2010 at the ISU Horticulture Research Station to evaluate dollar spot severity on creeping bentgrass.

The results of this study are mean to be relevant for disease severity ratings of many diseases and grasses, not just bentgrass and dollar spot.  
 

Figures

Examples of turf from the Hort farm plots infected with dollar spot.

1 and 2.

ISU Horticulture Farm turf plot marked out for the experiment. The white string was used to show where the corners of each were.  We then spray-painted the corners in order to visually locate where each plot was without the strings.  The strings were removed after all the corners had been painted so regular maintenance could continue.

WOI green located just north of Roy J. Carver Co-Lab on the northwest edge of the ISU campus.  It was marked out and prepared for the experiment in the exact same manner as the plots at the Research Station.