Whole Farm > Land Values > Farmland Value Surveys

2017 Farmland Value Survey Iowa State University

File C2-70
Updated December, 2017

download in pdf format pdf format

 

xls file xlsx file
Use this decision tool to compare the economic and financial impacts of purchasing a parcel of farmland.

xls file xlsx file
This spreadsheet provides historic Iowa land values for county, district, and state beginning in 1950.

The survey was initiated in 1941 and is sponsored annually by Iowa State University. Only the state average and the district averages are based directly on ISU survey data. County estimates are derived using a procedure that combines ISU survey results with data from the US Census of Agriculture. Since 2014, the survey has been conducted by the Center for Agricultural and Rural Development in the Department of Economics at Iowa State University and Iowa State University Extension and Outreach.

The survey is intended to provide information on general land value trends, geographical land price relationships, and factors influencing the Iowa land market. The survey is not intended to provide a direct estimate for any particular piece of property.
The survey is based on reports by licensed real estate brokers, farm managers, appraisers, agricultural lenders, county assessors, and selected individuals considered to be knowledgeable of land market conditions. Respondents were asked to report for more than one county if they were knowledgeable about the land markets. The 2017 survey is based on 877 usable county-level land values estimates provided by 710 agricultural professionals.

Of the 710 respondents, 64 percent completed the survey online. Online responses allow participants to provide estimates for up to 15 counties. A web portal has been developed to facilitate the visualization and analysis of Iowa farmland values by pooling data from ISU, USDA, Chicago Fed, and the Realtor Land Institute, as well as by making use of charts over time and interactive county maps. The portal can be accessed at www.card.iastate.edu/farmland.

Participants in the survey are asked to estimate the value of high-, medium-, and low-quality land in their county. Comparative sales and other factors are taken into account by the respondents in making these value estimates. This survey is the only data source that provides an annual land value estimate at the county level for each of the 99 counties in Iowa. In addition, this survey provides estimates of high-, medium-, and low- quality land at the crop reporting districts and state level.

The 2017 state average for all quality of land was estimated to be $7,326 per acre as of November 2017. This is an increase of $143 per acre from November 2016, and a 2.0 percent increase. This is the fi increase after three consecutive years of decline.

Figure 1.

Major factors Influencing the Real Estate Market

Most survey respondents listed positive and/or negative factors influencing the land market. Of these respondents, 80 percent listed at least one positive factor, and 81 percent listed at least one negative factor. In most cases, respondents listed multiple factors.

There were three positive factors listed by over 10 percent of respondents who provided at least one positive factor. The most frequently mentioned factor was low interest rates, mentioned by 21 percent of the respondents. Limited land supply was the second-most frequently mentioned positive factor, mentioned by 20 percent of the respondents. Other frequently mentioned positive factors included strong yields (15 percent), strong demand (six percent), and investor demand (five percent).

There was only one negative factor listed by more than 10 percent of respondents who identified at least one negative factor. The most frequently mentioned negative factor affecting land values was lower commodity prices, mentioned by 41 percent of respondents. High input prices and eroding cash and credit availability were the second-most frequently mentioned negative factors, with each mentioned by seven percent of respondents. Strong investment alternatives such as the stock market, an uncertain agricultural future, and weaker cash rents were mentioned by six, five, and four percent of the respondents, respectively.

table 1.Number of Sales Compared to Previous Year

Forty percent of respondents reported lower sales in 2017 relative to a year ago. On the other end of the spectrum, just 20 percent reported more sales, and 37 percent reported the same level of sales in 2017 relative to 2016.

Land Sales by Buyer Category

Respondents were asked what percent of the land was sold to the following five categories of buyers.

  • Existing farmers represented 72 percent of the sales, with local farmers making of 70 percent and two percent to relocating farmers.
  • Investors represented 22 percent.
  • New farmers represented four percent.
  • Other purchasers represented one percent.

Sales to existing farmers by Crop Reporting Districts ranged from 81 percent in Northwest to 52 percent in South Central.

Sales to investors were highest in South Central (34 percent). Northwest reported the lowest investor activity (15 percent).

Respondents by Occupation

The 2017 Iowa land value survey asked the main occupation of the respondent: farm managers, appraisers, agricultural lenders, brokers/realtors, government, farmers/landowners, and other. This year’s survey also asked about the number of years’ experience of respondents and number of counties they offer services in. Additionally, the land value survey was available online in addition to using the traditional mail copy.

In total, 710 agricultural professionals completed the survey, providing 877 county land value estimates. Of these 710 respondents, agricultural lenders represented the largest group, accounting for 42 percent of all respondents. Realtors/brokers, farm managers, and appraisers were the other three largest groups representing 14, 13, and nine percent of respondents, respectively.

Agricultural professionals on average have 25 years of experience in their current profession and offer service to an average of nine counties.

Land Quality and Corn Suitability Ratings

To gauge how each respondent defined         high-, medium-, and low-quality land for their county, we asked for estimated average CSR2 (Corn Suitability Rating 2) for high-, medium-, and low quality land. We also asked their estimates for the percent of land area for each land quality class.

Results in Table 2 show that agricultural professionals have adapted to CSR2. Approximately 90 percent of participants provided at least one CSR2 estimate for the corresponding land quality classes.

The estimated average CSR2 statewide for high-, medium-, and low- quality land is 82, 70, and 56 points respectively, and the reported estimated percent of land area for high-, medium-, and low- quality land is 36, 41, and 23 percent, respectively.

In addition, respondents ranked high-, medium-, and low-quality land based on relative conditions in their region. For example, the average CSR2 for high-quality land in the South Central district is 70, comparable to the CSR2 for low-quality land in Northwest district at 67.

table 2

Outlook for Land Values

After three consecutive declines since its 2013 peak, the average land value for all qualities of farmland saw its first increase. The estimated $7,326 per acre statewide average for all qualities of land represents a 2.0 percent increase from November 2016. To many, this recent 2.0 percent indicates a turnaround of the farmland market—58 percent of the respondents to the 2017 ISU survey expected another hike in their counties’ land value a year from now. However, as opposed to a result of improving farm income, this recent increase in land market is mainly driven by limited land supply. Given the rising interest rate and heightening farm financial stress across the Midwest, this recent bump could likely be just a temporary break in a continued downward adjustment in the farmland market.

Many supply and demand factors were behind this recent increase in the land market. First, the farmland market has always been a thin market with less farmland sales, but the past four years the farmland market has been extremely tight: for four consecutive years, more respondents to the ISU survey reported less sales in their county compared to the previous year. In this year’s survey, only 20 percent of the respondents reported more sales activities, while 44 and 37 percent reported less or similar sales activity, respectively. The limited farmland supply helped buoy market prices in many areas across the state. Second, the U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service forecasted that U.S. farm sector profits are relatively stable in 2017 after three consecutive years of decline: U.S. net farm income is forecast to increase $1.7 billion (2.7 percent) from 2016 to $63.2 billion in 2017 and net cash income is forecast to increase $3.7 billion (3.9 percent) to $96.9 billion.

Third, the 2017 Iowa State University Cost of Production estimates revealed that the estimated average cost for corn production in Iowa dipped by 12 percent to $3.51/bushel for corn following soybean production, and the average cost for soybean dropped by nine percent to $9.56 for herbicide resistant soybeans. Despite continued declines in commodity prices, the corresponding drop in production costs have resulted in breakeven or positive production margin for many producers this year, which has a positive impact on farm income and asset values.

The 2.0 percent increase boosted confidence of our respondents in the perceived strength of the farmland market despite growing farm financial stress, especially in the medium term. Fifty-eight percent of the respondents to our 2017 ISU survey forecasted an increase in their local land market a year later, while 25 percent expected a lower land value, and 18 percent forecasted no change a year later. Looking at the land market five years from now, a vast majority of respondents (83 percent) expect a higher land value than current levels, with only 13 percent forecasting a decline. This is consistent with their corn and soybean price forecast, which is a slow but steady improvement in the cash crop markets, both corn and soybean. The farm managers and rural appraisers at the May 2017, 90th annual, Soil Management and Land Valuation conference also expected a stabilization in Iowa‘s farmland market in late 2017 throughout 2018, but it may rebound a bit in the medium run before 2020.

I would caution any immediate hail of the turn of the Iowa farmland market given the stagnant farm income and rising interest rates. The fundamentals of the U.S. farm economy haven’t improved significantly, so this recent increase in land value to some extent is defying logic. There are several reasons for my caution. First, despite the 2.0 percent increase in nominal average state land values, the inflation-adjusted Iowa farmland value on average actually saw a 0.2 percent decline. In other words, the growth in general inflation in the U.S. economy actually outpaced the seeming gain in the farmland market. Second, the recent increase is largely influenced by very limited farmland supply, so if more farmers are forced to liquidate a portion of their assets due to heightening farm financial stress, there will be more land parcels available on the market, potentially allowing the land market to go down in the future. An analysis by Dr. Alejandro Plastina using farm data from the Iowa Farm Business Association shows that the share of financially stressed farms (vulnerable liquidity or solvency ratings) increased from 38 percent in December 2014 to 47 percent in December 2016. The Federal Reserve Banks in Chicago and Kansas City also reported continued deterioration in agricultural credit conditions, as a result, the downward pressures on the farmland market are still present. Finally, many neighboring states, from Kansas and Nebraska to Illinois and Indiana, all saw a modest decline in their land market compared to a year ago, according the surveys conducted by the Federal Reserve Banks of Chicago and Kansas City. There is no explicit reason to believe that Iowa’s land market has a fundamentally different dynamic than those of neighboring states, especially Illinois and Indiana. Actually, the Ag Economy Barometer, a nationwide producer survey conducted by Purdue University, reported that more producers expected to see a lower land value in their area as opposed to a higher land value.

Put simply, land value is the net present value of all discounted future income flows. With certain assumptions imposed, one could think of land value being net income divided by interest (discount) rate. To understand the changes in land value over time and across space, it is useful to examine how net income and interest rates will change over the next few years. In particular, trends in net income for a particular region will be reflected in the farmland market, which tends to be localized.

With the boost of strong yields, the prospect for the agricultural economy is showing signs of stabilization after four consecutive years of declines. USDA Economic Research Service forecasted in August 2017 that U.S. net farm income will rise 2.7 percent in 2017. However, the USDA Office of Chief Economist long-term forecast to 2026 expected a slow improvement in farm income as opposed to a sudden rebound. In other words, in the immediate future, we are likely to see stagnation in the net farm income and farm sector profits, which is prone to shocks of NAFTA renegotiations and implies a stagnant land market in the near future.

In addition, even with the shift in its leadership, the Federal Reserve Bank will likely continue its efforts to raise the interest rates. Over the past two years, the Federal Reserve Bank has made three hikes, each 25 basis points, to the short- term federal funds rate to over one percent. The agricultural lenders have responded to raise the fixed and variable agricultural loans rates to its highest level in five years at more than 5.5 percent. This trend will likely continue especially in light of the growing agricultural debt repayment problems experienced at some agricultural banks. With stagnant future farm income and a highly probable increase in interest rates, we might see farmland values continue to recede due to stagnant commodity prices, new uncertainty regarding agricultural trade such as NAFTA renegotiations, and possible stress sales from some producers.

Despite the recent increase driven by limited land supply, the economic fundamentals suggest that the Iowa farmland market appears to have peaked for the foreseeable future, and we may expect to see it drifting sideways. In other words, it seems that the current farmland market hasn’t fully capitalized the reduction of net farm income off its 2013 peak yet.

U.S. crop agriculture continues on an amazing productivity run. The last five corn crops were the five largest ever produced, and the last four soybean crops were the four largest ever. This run is the result of a combination of improved seed genetics and mostly favorable weather conditions, and it is likely to continue into the next season. While these phenomenal yields help drive the per bushel production cost down, the abundant supply resulting from record yields also often leads to even lower commodity prices. Although current futures prices for the 2018 crops are offering a somewhat better outlook with the 2018/19 season average corn and soybean price around $3.80 and $9.90 per bushel, respectively, projections for the 2018/19 crop margins would be slightly below breakeven for both crops because of current wide basis levels. The likely high yields for next production season will exacerbate the oversupply of corn and soybean and thus keep the prices at low levels. This low-to-negative crop production margin likely will put additional downward pressure on the land market. Similarly, both the hog and cattle prices were stable compared to a year ago, but about 20 percent lower than two years ago, and the effects of strong livestock profits compensating crop profit loss are much weaker.

Farmland sale activities tend to be correlated with changes in land values - with the current farm downturn, landowners tend to continue to hold land parcels and postpone their land sales, which results in a continuation of less farmland sales. With the continued decline in farm income and profitability, some existing landowners may reconsider retirement and sell their land eventually.

The heightening farm financial stress is already putting pressure on some vulnerable producers to liquidate some of their assets. To the extent that this will lead to more land parcels on the market, which is not much given the current tight market, there could be additional downward pressure on the farmland market. According to the 2012 Iowa Farmland Ownership and Tenure Survey, half of Iowa’s farmland has been held for more than 20 years. As a result, a large influx of farmland supply is not likely, but this potential rise in farmland sale activity and continued decline in farmland values might present opportunities for beginning farmers and ranchers to enter the market.

Farmland has historically been a fairly robust investment that generates relatively stable returns. Since 1941 the nominal and inflation-adjusted Iowa farmland values have averaged 6.5 percent and 2.7 percent increase per year, respectively. Farmland values have increased 73 percent of the years, decreased 26 percent of the years, and remained unchanged for three years between 1910 and 2017. While 20 percent of Iowa farmland is mainly owned for family or sentimental reasons, the strong robust returns have and will continue to attract interested farmers and investors to invest in the farmland market.

There are several unique uncertainties worth watching over the next year or two. First, it remains unclear how quickly and by how much the Fed will raise interest rates. Second, it is uncertain how trade agreement renegotiations, like NAFTA, will affect agricultural exports and farm income.

This is particularly relevant for Iowa as it is one of the few states that have a trade surplus with Mexico, and disruptions of NAFTA could have major negative implications for the Midwest agricultural economy. Third, the agricultural sector is closely watching possible policy changes, especially the 2018 Farm Bill discussions and the impacts of new tax reform. Fourth, it is critical to watch whether the improved farm income and land market lead to landowners’ growing interest in selling land, or more stressed sales from financially stressed producers.

If we define a "golden era" in agriculture as a period when the inflation-adjusted value of farmland significantly exceeds the 1910 level, we can argue that there have been three major golden eras in modern U.S. agriculture over the last 100 years: 1910-1920, 1973-1981, and most recently, 2003-2013. With current commodity prices and U.S. farm income and asset values declining significantly, many farmers and agricultural professionals worry about the current farm downturn deteriorating into another farm crisis. However, I would argue that despite the growing financial stress across the Midwest over the past few years, we are unlikely to see a replay of 1980s farm crisis as evidenced by the sudden, precipitous collapse of the U.S. agricultural land market and mounting delinquent farm loans and foreclosures. This somewhat optimistic outlook mainly stems from the strong farm income growth from 2003 to 2013, the historically low interest rate environment, and more prudent agricultural lending practices. In addition, our analysis suggests that the trajectory of the current farm downturn will likely be a gradual, drawn-out one like that of the 1920s farm crisis, as opposed to a sudden collapse as in the 1980s farm crisis.

Across the Midwest, there are signs of deteriorating agricultural credit conditions and a continued, prolonged downturn in the agricultural economy, although with a much slower pace. Given the rising interest rates and stagnant farm income, I would not be surprised to see a continued decline in values in the future. This recent bump of Iowa farmland market, to me, seems more like a temporary break in a downward adjustment trajectory.

Table 3

figures 2 and 3

 

2017 Iowa Farmland Value Survey -- Extension web site dedicated to the ISU Land Value Survey, including information from the 2017 news conference and the presentation by Dr. Wendong Zhang

2016 Iowa Farmland Value Survey -- Extension web site dedicated to the ISU Land Value Survey, including information from the 2016 news conference and the presentation by Dr. Wendong Zhang

2015 Iowa Farmland Value Survey -- Extension web site dedicated to the ISU Land Value Survey, including information from the 2015 news conference and the presentation by Dr. Wendong Zhang

2014 Iowa Farmland Value Survey -- Extension web site dedicated to the ISU Land Value Survey, including information from the 2014 news conference and the presentation by Dr. Mike Duffy.

2013 Iowa Farmland Value Survey -- Extension web site dedicated to the ISU Land Value Survey, including information from the 2013 news conference and the presentation by Dr. Mike Duffy.

2012 Iowa Farmland Value Survey -- Extension web site dedicated to the ISU Land Value Survey, including information from the 2012 news conference and the presentation by Dr. Mike Duffy.

2011 Iowa Farmland Value Survey -- Extension web site dedicated to the ISU Land Value Survey, including information from the 2011 news conference and the presentation by Dr. Mike Duffy.

2010 Iowa Land Value Survey -- Extension web site dedicated to the ISU Land Value Survey, including information from the 2010 news conference and the presentation by Dr. Mike Duffy.

 

Wendong Zhang, extension economist, 515-294-2536, wdzhang@iastate.edu