Link to Home  

Link to CurriculumLink to ResearchLink to ImplementationLink to How  to OrderLink to Special AudiencesLink to Traininglink to Making a Difference for Families

 

SFP 10-14 has been scientifically evaluated in a randomized, controlled test with families of sixth graders through Project Family at the ISBR at Iowa State University. This large-scale, experimental design trial involved random assignment of 33 Iowa Public Schools. Outcome evaluations entailed the use of multi-informant, multi-method measurement procedures at pretest, posttest, and follow-up data collections completed approximately one half, one and one half, two and one half, four, and six years after pretest.

Assessments included in-home videotapes of families in structured family interaction tasks and in-home interviews that included scales from standardized instruments and commonly used measures such as the National Survey of Delinquency and Drug Use. A total of 161 families participated in 21 intervention groups at eleven different schools, with group sizes ranging from three to fifteen families. Participation rates were high among pretested families. Ninety-four percent of attending pretested families were represented by a family member in five or more sessions.

An analysis of data demonstrated positive results for both parents and youth. Comparisons between the intervention and control groups showed significantly improved parenting behaviors (e.g., communicating specific rules and consequences for using substances, controlling anger when communicating with the child, positive involvement with the child, and better communication with the child). Analyses of youth substance use and use-related child outcomes (e.g., substance use, problem conduct, school-related problem behaviors, affiliation with antisocial peers, peer resistance) have demonstrated positive outcomes at follow-up assessments. Compared with youth in the control group, those in the intervention group showed statistically significant delays in initiation of alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana use. For some outcomes, positive results—differences between youth who attended the program and the control youth—actually increased over the six years of follow-up assessment.

 red line

09/03/06 -ISU research shows Extension programs produce long-term prevention of meth use
Iowa State University research programs designed to prevent destructive behaviors among youth have now been proven to be effective in reducing methamphetamine use by adolescents according to new results from two studies of more than 1,300 students from rural Iowa public schools by researchers from Partnerships in Prevention Science at Iowa State, working with ISU Extension. More...
(Iowa State University News Service)

 red line

 
 
   
 
   
  Links
 
 

Description of Major Longitudinal Study

  • Evaluated through Project Family at the Institute for Social and Behavioral Research at Iowa State University
  • Tested with 446 families who live in areas with a high percentage of economically-stressed families
  • Participants were randomly assigned and comparisons were made between program participants and control families
  • Study followed the youth and their parents from 6th through 12th grade

Results

  • Youth attending the program had significantly lower rates of alcohol, tobacco and marijuana use compared to control youth.
  • The differences between program and control youth actually increased over time, indicating that skills learned and strong parent-child relationships continue to have greater and greater influence.
  • Youth attending the program had significantly fewer conduct problems in school than youth in the control group.
  • Parents showed gains in specific parenting skills including setting appropriate limits and building a positive relationship with their youth.
  • Parents showed an increase in positive feelings towards their child.
  • Parents show gains on general child management including setting rules and following through with consequences.
  • Parents increase skills in General Child Management such as effectively monitoring youth and having appropriate and consistent discipline.

Risk and Protective Factors

Family Risk Factors:

  • Family history of the problem behavior/Parent criminality
  • Family management problems/Poor parental supervision and/or monitoring
  • Pattern of high family conflict
  • Poor family attachment/Bonding
  • Parental use of physical punishment/Harsh and/or erratic discipline practices
Individual Risk Factors:
  • Anti-social behavior and alienation/Delinquent beliefs/General delinquency involvement/Drug dealing
  • Favorable attitudes toward drug use/Early onset of AOD use/Alcohol and/or drug use
  • Early onset of aggression and/or violence
  • Poor refusal skills
Family Protective Factors:
  • Effective parenting
  • Good relationships with parents / Bonding or attachment to family
  • Opportunities for prosocial family involvement
  • Having a stable family
  • High expectations
Individual Protective Factors:
  • Social competencies and problem-solving skills
  • Self-efficacy
  • Healthy / Conventional beliefs and clear standards
  • Perception of social support from adults and peers