Warm September
Corn dry-down rates
Grain harvest tips
Hidden harvest losses
Data collection
Introduction
Warm and dry conditions
have prevailed over west-central IA for the past two weeks, allowing
for rapid crop maturity and drying in the field. The same
conditions should continue through this week. Most corn has reached
maturity in the area, and is drying down at a rate of about three
quarters of a point of moisture per day. Soybean harvest has begun,
harvesting at the correct moisture is very important for storage and
to avoid potentially large harvest losses in the field. Harvest is
also a time of data collection. I am particularly interested in
strip trials comparing treated vs. non-treated areas of soybeans
with fungicides and insecticides. If you have information to share,
please use the forms listed at the end of this newsletter.
|
Table 1. Degree-Day Weekly Accumulation |
|
|
2005 |
2004 |
2003 |
14-Yr Ave |
|
Sept 12-18 |
112 |
120 |
96 |
96 |
|
Forcasted Sept 19-25 |
128 |
120 |
56 |
58 |
|
|
Table 2. 2005 Degree-Day % of Average (by planting date) |
|
|
10-Apr |
15-Apr |
20-Apr |
25-Apr |
30-Apr |
05-May |
10-May |
Ave |
|
last week |
108% |
108% |
106% |
107% |
108% |
109% |
108% |
107% |
|
this week |
111% |
110% |
109% |
109% |
110% |
111% |
110% |
110% |
Crop Management
Physiological maturity
Most corn across the region should be near or well past
physiological maturity (characterized by formation of the “black
layer” at the base of the corn kernel) as shown in figure 1. Next
will be harvest maturity, which will be determined when the grain in
the field reaches moisture levels you determine are low enough for
harvest.

Dry down
rates of corn. Now that
many fields of corn across the area are near or past physiological
maturity, the rate of in-field dry down will determine when harvest
maturity is reached. Peter Thomison (Ohio State University)
described in the CORN Newsletter (http://agcrops.osu.edu/index.php)
the rates in which corn grain dries. The following dry down rates
were derived from research in western Ohio, therefore they may be
different for northwest IA, but they are a good baseline to work
from. Starting point for this is black layer, of course.
-
Corn will normally dry approximately 3/4 to
1 point of moisture per day during favorable drying weather
(sunny and breezy) during the early warmer part of the harvest
season from mid to late September
-
Early to mid-October, dry-down rates will
usually drop to 1/2 to 3/4% per day.
-
Late October to early November, field
dry-down rates will usually drop to 1/4 to 1/2% per day.
Estimating
dry-down rates can also be considered in terms of Growing
Degree-Days (GDDs). It takes about 30 GDDs to lower grain moisture
each point from 30% down to 25%. Drying from 25 to 20 percent
requires about 45 GDDs per point of moisture.
|
Table 2. Estimated Corn "In-Field" Dry-Down |
|
|
Current Moisture Between |
|
|
30% - 25% |
25% - 20% |
|
|
Moisture lost (%) |
|
Last Week |
3.7 |
2.5 |
|
This Week |
4.3 |
2.8 |
Grain
Harvest Tips
Grain Moisture Content
for Safe Storage (by Paul
Kassel, ISUE Crops Field Specialist)
Soybean
Harvest losses – rules of thumb.
Hidden
Soybean Yield Loss: When
soybeans are harvested below 13% moisture, yield is lost. For
example: 50 bushel per acre soybean yield at 9 % moisture equals 2.4
bushel per acre hidden soybean yield loss (13% moisture minus 9%
moisture equals 4 points of moisture times 0.6 bu/point/acre hidden
yield loss, or 2.4 bushel per acre). See table 3.
|
Table 3. Soybean yield loss when
harvested below 13% moisture |
|
|
Harvest moisture level of soybeans |
|
|
Yield |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
Rule of thumb |
|
|
---Bu/acre yield loss--- |
|
|
60 bu/a |
4.1 |
3.4 |
2.7 |
2.0 |
1.3 |
0.7 |
0 |
0.7 bu/A/point |
|
50 bu/a |
3.4 |
2.8 |
2.2 |
1.6 |
1.1 |
0.6 |
0 |
0.6 bu/A/point |
|
40 bu/a |
2.7 |
2.3 |
1.8 |
1.2 |
0.8 |
0.5 |
0 |
0.5 bu/A/point |
|
30 bu/a |
2.1 |
1.7 |
1.4 |
1.0 |
0.7 |
0.4 |
0 |
0.3 bu/A/point |
Data
Collection
Harvest time is a period
of data collection, particularly collection of corn and soybean
yields. Of particular interest to me are comparisons between
treated and non-treated areas of fungicide and/or insecticide
treatments applied to soybeans to control either (or both) soybean
foliar disease or soybean aphids. This information can be very
useful in following years when making a decision to treat for a
pest. Most importantly, the more data points available to make the
decision, the better informed the decision will be. So if you
applied a side-by-side treated vs. non-treated comparison on your
farm, and would like to share your results, please fill out one or
both of the following forms. I will take the data collected around
the region and present it in this newsletter, hopefully showing
trends that will help us make better informed decisions in following
years.
Please find the
“Treated vs. Non-Treated” printable PDF forms at these URL’s:
Soybean aphid
insecticide treatment form:
http://www.extension.iastate.edu/nwcrops/Soybean-Aphid-Insecticide-Treatment-Survey-2005.pdf
Soybean disease
fungicide treatment form:
http://www.extension.iastate.edu/nwcrops/Soybean-fungicide-Treatment-Survey-2005.pdf