farmstead picture
 
 
Resource Homepages  
ISU Extension
Agronomy- Extension
IA State Univ.
IA Dept. of Ag
IA DNR
IA Crop and Pest Mngt. Newsletters
Field and Feedlot
J. Dejong
V. Schmitt
J. Holmes
J. Fawcett
B. Lang
ICM  (IA)
Other States
MN Crop News
C.O.R.N. (Ohio)
Crop Watch (NE)
the Bulletin (IL)
Current topics (KS)
CAT Alert (MSU)
Chat-n-Chew
Purdue
MN Pest Report
SW MN Pest
WI Crop Mngr
ICPM (MO)
Other States
Organic Ag
Weather Data
Iowa Mesonet
IDALS
MN Ag Climate
High Plains RCC
NCDC
Ag Weather
Biotechnology
AgBioWorld (for)
ETCgroup (against)
 
Agriculture Search Engines
AgNIC
AgFind
Agriculture Databases
Agrisurf
AgView
AgWeb
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

ISU Extension Logo

Northwest Iowa Crop Update Newsletter
by Todd Vagts
ISU Extension Crops Specialist
Counties Served:  Carroll, Calhoun, Crawford, Ida, Monona, Pocahontas and Sac.

   
[Home][Special Topics][Weather Data][Subsoil H20][PDF Info] [ISU Extension][IA State University]
 

Volume 5, Number 25
Northwest IA Crop Update, September 19, 2005
Print or view this newsletter in  PDF or Microsoft Word format.

In this issue

bullet Warm September
bullet Corn dry-down rates
bullet Grain harvest tips
bullet Hidden harvest losses
bullet Data collection

Introduction
Warm and dry conditions have prevailed over west-central IA for the past two weeks, allowing for rapid crop maturity and drying in the field.  The same conditions should continue through this week.  Most corn has reached maturity in the area, and is drying down at a rate of about three quarters of a point of moisture per day.  Soybean harvest has begun, harvesting at the correct moisture is very important for storage and to avoid potentially large harvest losses in the field.  Harvest is also a time of data collection.  I am particularly interested in strip trials comparing treated vs. non-treated areas of soybeans with fungicides and insecticides.  If you have information to share, please use the forms listed at the end of this newsletter.   

Weather information
Growing Degree Day  What month is it?  The 14-year average GDD lines (figure 1) indicate that degree-day accumulations should be declining, yet the current year lines keep going up (in a somewhat erratic fashion).  Above normal temperatures since early September and forecasted through this week will push the season’s accumulation to 107 - 110% of normal.  Last week’s degree-day accumulation was 116% above average and the forecast for the coming week shows accumulations of 220% of normal (table 1).  Warmer than normal temperatures can be favorable at this time of year to aid in crop and grain dry-down in the field.  Accumulation and predicted plant phenology stages are shown in Table 1 and Figure 1 and is forecasted through Sept. 25.  More detailed degree-day accumulations by planting date can be obtained at this URL:  http://www.extension.iastate.edu/nwcrops/degree-days-2005.htm

Table 1.  Degree-Day Weekly Accumulation
  2005 2004 2003 14-Yr Ave
Sept 12-18 112 120 96 96
Forcasted Sept 19-25 128 120 56 58


 

  Table 2.  2005 Degree-Day % of Average (by planting date)
  10-Apr 15-Apr 20-Apr 25-Apr 30-Apr 05-May 10-May Ave
last week 108% 108% 106% 107% 108% 109% 108% 107%
this week 111% 110% 109% 109% 110% 111% 110% 110%

Crop Management
Physiological maturity Most corn across the region should be near or well past physiological maturity (characterized by formation of the “black layer” at the base of the corn kernel) as shown in figure 1.  Next will be harvest maturity, which will be determined when the grain in the field reaches moisture levels you determine are low enough for harvest.

graph

Dry down rates of corn.  Now that many fields of corn across the area are near or past physiological maturity, the rate of in-field dry down will determine when harvest maturity is reached.  Peter Thomison (Ohio State University) described in the CORN Newsletter (http://agcrops.osu.edu/index.php) the rates in which corn grain dries. The following dry down rates were derived from research in western Ohio, therefore they may be different for northwest IA, but they are a good baseline to work from.  Starting point for this is black layer, of course.

  • Corn will normally dry approximately 3/4 to 1 point of moisture per day during favorable drying weather (sunny and breezy) during the early warmer part of the harvest season from mid to late September 

  • Early to mid-October, dry-down rates will usually drop to 1/2 to 3/4% per day.

  • Late October to early November, field dry-down rates will usually drop to 1/4 to 1/2% per day.

Estimating dry-down rates can also be considered in terms of Growing Degree-Days (GDDs). It takes about 30 GDDs to lower grain moisture each point from 30% down to 25%. Drying from 25 to 20 percent requires about 45 GDDs per point of moisture.

Table 2.  Estimated Corn "In-Field" Dry-Down
  Current Moisture Between
  30% - 25% 25% - 20%
  Moisture lost (%)
Last Week 3.7 2.5
This Week 4.3 2.8

Grain Harvest Tips
Grain Moisture Content for Safe Storage (by Paul Kassel, ISUE Crops Field Specialist)

  • Soybeans – sold by spring                   14.0 %

  • Soybeans – stored up to one year        12.0 %

Soybean Harvest losses – rules of thumb.

  • 4 soybeans per square foot equal one bu/a loss.

  • Be sure to include soybeans in uncut stubble.

Hidden Soybean Yield Loss:  When soybeans are harvested below 13% moisture, yield is lost.  For example: 50 bushel per acre soybean yield at 9 % moisture equals 2.4 bushel per acre hidden soybean yield loss (13% moisture minus 9% moisture equals 4 points of moisture times 0.6 bu/point/acre hidden yield loss, or 2.4 bushel per acre).  See table 3.

Table 3.  Soybean yield loss when harvested below 13% moisture

 

Harvest moisture level of soybeans

 

Yield

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

Rule of thumb

 

---Bu/acre yield loss---

 

60 bu/a

4.1

3.4

2.7

2.0

1.3

0.7

0

0.7 bu/A/point

50 bu/a

3.4

2.8

2.2

1.6

1.1

0.6

0

0.6 bu/A/point

40 bu/a

2.7

2.3

1.8

1.2

0.8

0.5

0

0.5 bu/A/point

30 bu/a

2.1

1.7

1.4

1.0

0.7

0.4

0

0.3 bu/A/point

Data Collection
Harvest time is a period of data collection, particularly collection of corn and soybean yields.  Of particular interest to me are comparisons between treated and non-treated areas of fungicide and/or insecticide treatments applied to soybeans to control either (or both) soybean foliar disease or soybean aphids.  This information can be very useful in following years when making a decision to treat for a pest.  Most importantly, the more data points available to make the decision, the better informed the decision will be.  So if you applied a side-by-side treated vs. non-treated comparison on your farm, and would like to share your results, please fill out one or both of the following forms.  I will take the data collected around the region and present it in this newsletter, hopefully showing trends that will help us make better informed decisions in following years.

Please find the “Treated vs. Non-Treated” printable PDF forms at these URL’s:

Soybean aphid insecticide treatment form:
http://www.extension.iastate.edu/nwcrops/Soybean-Aphid-Insecticide-Treatment-Survey-2005.pdf

Soybean disease fungicide treatment form: 
http://www.extension.iastate.edu/nwcrops/Soybean-fungicide-Treatment-Survey-2005.pdf

 

 

Print or view this newsletter in PDF or Microsoft Word format.


Todd Vagts
Iowa State University Extension
Field Crops Specialist
1240 D. Heires Avenue 
Carroll, IA 51401 
Office: 712-792-2364; Cell: 712-249-6025;  Fax: 712-792-2366
Email: vagts@iastate.edu  

For questions or comments please respond to vagts@iastate.edu

The information given in this publication is for educational purposes only.
Reference to commercial products is made with the understanding that no
discrimination is intended and no endorsement by Iowa State University with
any specific product(s) used in this is implied

This page last updated on 09/20/05

Non-Discrimination and information