|
| |

Northwest Iowa Crop Update Newsletter
by
Todd Vagts
ISU Extension Crops Specialist
Counties Served: Carroll, Calhoun, Crawford, Ida, Monona,
Pocahontas and Sac. |
 |
| |
|
| [Home][Special
Topics][Weather
Data][Subsoil H20][PDF
Info] [ISU
Extension][IA State University] |
| |
|
Volume 3, Number 25
Northwest IA Crop Update, September 2, 2003
Print this newsletter using
Acrobat Reader
or Microsoft Word.
In this issue
Two months without rain
How much yield potential was lost in August?
Be prepared to harvest drought stressed crops
Scout corn for stalk rot
Evaluate your corn nitrogen program
Charcoal Rot: A new disease to IA soybeans
The long dry spell continues for many areas, reaching 58 days
without a major rain in some locations. The late summer drought has impacted
crop yields. By how much is anyone’s guess, at least until the combines move
into the fields. A crop simulation model indicates a greater impact to soybean
yield than corn, which would be expected with an August drought. Preparations
for harvesting drought stressed crops should begin now. Scouting for stalk rot
problems, preparing a clean storage facility, and obtaining the guidelines for
submitting forage and/or seed samples for nitrate and mycotoxin testing should
be on your list of things to do. Charcoal rot, a disease commonly found in the
southern U.S. soybean acreage, has found its way to IA. Areas in soybean fields
that die prematurely may be infected with this new disease.
Weather
Dry conditions have prevailed over much of
Iowa over the last two months; some areas have been much drier than others.
Large precipitation events in June and the first few days in July make summer
precipitation totals look adequate, yet a dry period from early July through
August have left many areas without any appreciable precipitation events for 58
days. Good subsoil moisture reserves have greatly aided area crops through the
dry period, but in many cases yields have suffered due to moisture stress.
|
Monthly Precipitation for Selected Location in west-central IA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audubon |
Carroll |
Denison |
Fort Dodge |
Guthrie Center |
Holstein |
Jefferson |
Onawa |
Poke |
Rockwell City |
Sac City |
|
|
Precipitation in Inches |
|
June |
3.5 |
4.1 |
1.9 |
4.5 |
2.7 |
5.2 |
5.3 |
3.1 |
6.2 |
2.7 |
3.2 |
|
July |
1.2 |
5.7 |
2.8 |
3.6 |
3.4 |
4.3 |
6.5 |
5.6 |
5.9 |
7 |
6.8 |
|
August |
1.32 |
0.54 |
0.48 |
0 |
1.21 |
0.56 |
1.07 |
0.97 |
1.22 |
0.45 |
0.2 |
|
Sept. |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Total |
6.02 |
10.34 |
5.18 |
8.1 |
7.31 |
10.06 |
12.87 |
9.67 |
13.32 |
10.15 |
10.2 |
|
|
Days Since Last 1/4 in. Precipitation event |
|
|
57 |
25 |
44 |
49 |
24 |
58 |
25 |
18 |
24 |
58 |
44 |
Row-Crop and Forage Development
How much yield “Potential” did the area lose
in August? This question has been weighing on most peoples minds and is
anyone’s guess as to what the real numbers might be. To help alleviate my own
curiosity, I looked to my computer where I have been working with a crop (corn
and soybean) simulation model which uses local climatic conditions to mimic crop
growth and development and to generate an estimate on final yield. I ran the
model with updated weather data about every two weeks this summer to get an
updated picture of how the corn and soybean crop was doing. (The model needs a
full year’s worth of weather data to operate, so I use 2003 weather data up to
the day I run the model, then I use previous year’s weather data (2001 and 2002)
to finish the year out.) Yield “potentials” were high and relatively stable up
through August 1, indicating little crop (weather) stress up to that point. I
then ran the model on August 26 (replaced 26 days of “previous years” weather
data with current data) which then gave a good picture of how 2003 August
weather may have affected area crops.
The results indicated a decline in “Potential” grain yield
of 24% – 30% for corn and 45% - 48% for soybean.
Before this information is taken to the bank (or coffee
shops); a few key points must be stressed with this data. The “potential” yield
that the model generated on Aug 1 was very high, indicating very good growing
conditions up to that point. A significant drop in yield potential may still
result in good or average yields for both crops. Additionally, local field
results will vary widely depending on site specific soil conditions, planting
date, hybrid/variety grown, precipitation, rooting capacity and soil fertility.
And finally, weather data was collected from only two points in west-central IA
which may not reflect other field locations across the state.
Stalk rot scouting Late season drought stress can
greatly enhance stalk rot problems in corn fields, resulting in lodging problems
before harvest. Scouting involves looking for lower stalk discoloration and
test stalk firmness by pinching the lower internodes between your thumb and
forefinger. Healthy stalks are firm and won't compress easily. If a node can be
compressed or otherwise feels soft, rotting has started that plant is a good
candidate for lodging. Check at least 100 plants per field, in representative
locations. Fields with different tillage systems that are in different
rotations, planted to different hybrids or with different fertility histories
should be scouted separately. If more than 10-15 percent of the stalks show rot
damage in a field, significant lodging is likely. If possible, harvest high
lodging potential fields early. And don’t forget to record the stalk rot
incidence in field records so you can use this year’s problems to avoid future
problems.
Information on Harvesting and Storing Drought Stressed
Crops can be obtained from this web URL:
http://www.exnet.iastate.edu/Pages/grain/news/03drought/03drought.html
Fertility Management
Sampling time for the end-of-season cornstalk test to evaluate nitrogen
management is rapidly approaching. Basic information for doing the test is
provided in extension publication Pm 1584, Cornstalk Testing to Evaluate
Nitrogen Management. Find the publication at:
http://www.exnet.iastate.edu/Publications/PM1584.pdf
Plant Pest and Disease
Charcoal rot in soybeans. Dr. X. B. Yang (ISU Extension Plant
Pathologist) has confirmed that many of the areas that are dying prematurely in
soybeans are dying from charcoal rot (Macrophomina phaseolin). This disease is
favored by dry conditions. To correctly identify charcoal rot in soybeans, it is
critical that plants be examined within a small window of time immediately after
plant death. The fungus is opportunistic specie and may infect the plant after
it is dead from some other disease. Early symptoms are a wilting or flagging of
soybean leaves during the midday heat with plants recovering in the evening.
This wilt will eventually become permanent and plants will begin to turn yellow
and die. On dead plants, microsclerotia can be found after removing the
epidermis (bark) from the taproot. Microsclerotia are very small black dots.
(Photo by X.B. Yang)

Soybean Aphid Update: Treatment of soybean aphids
is now completed. It’s important to collect information from treated vs.
non-treated strips. Useful information is a yield comparison and aphid
population estimates. Take a picture if dramatic differences are noted between
the treated and untreated areas. Pictures and information on soybean aphids can
be found at:
http://www.extension.iastate.edu/carroll/crops/soybean-aphid.htm
ISU ICM Conferernce. Mark your calendar now for the ICM Conference in
Ames. The dates are December 3-4, and the location is the ISU Center (C.Y.
Stevens, Fisher Theatre, & the Schemann Building). One of the key note speakers
will be Dr. Ken Ostlie, University of Minnesota Extension Entomologist. Dr.
Ostlie will share his experiences and what he learned about the soybean aphid in
2003.
|
Todd Vagts
Iowa State University Extension
Field Crops Specialist
1240 D. Heires Avenue
Carroll, IA 51401
Office: 712-792-2364; Cell: 712-249-6025; Fax: 712-792-2366
Email: vagts@iastate.edu
For questions or comments please respond to
vagts@iastate.edu
This page last updated on
09/05/03
Non-Discrimination and information
|
|