|
Back to Field and
Feedlot Homepage
In this issue
Grain Management Thoughts for Fall
Iowa
Quality Cull Beef Cow Marketing
Rodent
Control Around Livestock Facilities
Ask a Specialist
Grain
Management Thoughts for Fall
by Joel DeJong, ISU
Extension Crops Field Specialist
In the fall I
often get questions about grain storage, grain shrink, and other management
questions. Some answers I know. At other times I find great information on
the Internet. Here are a couple of common questions for this time of year
that you might find useful, too.
Last week a
person called and asked how much per bushel his drying costs increased when
his propane costs went from $.50 per gallon to $.80 per gallon. From a
University of Minnesota publication found on the web I learned that, in high
temperature drying, propane use equals about .02 gal/bu per percentage point
of moisture removed. By doing a little math, I learned that the propane
cost per point went from 1 cent to 1.6 cents. What, I was also asked, is
the recommended storage moisture for clean, aerated corn? For up to 6
months 15% is O.K., for more than 6 months, 13% is recommended. If corn
quality is poor, drop each 1 percentage point.
This Minnesota
web site provides information on grain drying, management of grain in
storage (including when and how to run your aeration fan), and other great
hints: http://www.extension.umn.edu/topics.html?topic=4&subtopic=44
. If you don’t have internet let me know and I will get a couple of the
publications that can give you some great help!
What about
shrink? How much am I actually losing when I dry down my corn. The
National Corn Handbook has a good article on this topic. It can be found on
the web at: http://www.extension.iastate.edu/Publications/NCH61.pdf
. This publication discusses water shrink, handling loss, custom drying and
grain sales alternatives.
Another
question - How much phosphate and potash are removed when stalks are
baled? Recent information from John Sawyer, our ISU Extension Soil
Fertility Specialist, indicates that the removal of 1 ton of corn stover
(entire plant except for the grain) removes about 5.9# of phosphate and 25
pounds of potash. A ton of soybean stover (stems, not leaves) removes about
2.8 pounds of phosphate and 9.9 pounds of potash. When bales of these
products are harvested for bedding, perhaps it is wise to consider this in
the application rates if the soils test in the very low, low or optimum
categories.
What do you
lose if a field burns? Check out this
10/23/00
article for a good discussion: http://www.ipm.iastate.edu/ipm/icm/2000/10-23-2000/dryfallfires.html
- and also some of the numbers behind those removal rate amounts mentioned
in the previous paragraph, too.
Managing your
crop is a year around business - and requires a lot of knowledge. Don't
forget to check at your local Extension office for help in answering
questions you might have!
Iowa Quality Cull Beef Cow
Marketing Program
by Dennis
DeWitt, ISU Extension Livestock Field Specialist
Objectives
The
principle objective of the Iowa Quality Cull Beef Cow Marketing Program is
to provide information to area beef producers they can use in adding value
to their beef cow enterprise. This program provides cow-calf producers
information on feedlot performance, average daily gain, and carcass merit
data on cull beef cows. This information can be used by the producer to
change feeding programs or as a basis for change in a producer’s marketing
program. Cows may have ultra-sound data collected after delivery to
establish baseline information and to evaluate changes in backfat, ribeye
area and %IM fat.
Rules
-
Iowa cow-calf
producers with Iowa cows only will be accepted. No Back Tagged Cows
Allowed. If more entries are received than there is pen space, priority
will be determined by entry date.
-
A pen reservation fee of $25 per cow must accompany
entry form. The balance of the feeding program costs will be financed at
8% interest. Final settlements will be made after harvest of the entire
group.
-
Entries are due Monday November 4. A minimum of
50-cows is required in the marketing group.
-
Delivery is Monday November 18 to Iowa Lakes
Community College Farm, Emmetsburg.
-
At delivery, all cows will be double ear tagged. The
owners cow’s eartag(s) will be removed.
-
Cow death will be a financial loss to the owner. If
costs are greater than pre-payments, balance will be billed.
-
There will be an $8.00 per head data collection fee
assessed to each cow.
-
Cows will be fed a warm-up ration for 14-days. They
will be weighed individually again at 28-days after delivery and prior to
harvest. Projected harvest will be 70-90 days after delivery.
-
ILCC has the right of refusal of cull cows upon
arrival regarding weight, health and temperament.
- The
CHIPS Board and ILCC feedlot reserves the right to disqualify any cow at
any time if a problem arises with a cow. Animals may be sold or returned
to original owner upon reimbursement for expenses
Health Requirements
Cows
should be open; dehorned
or polled; in good
health; free of foot rot, pink eye, draining abscesses, cancer eye or any
other contagious diseases.
Feeding Method
The
total feed bill will be split based on an individual cow’s delivery weight,
final weight, days on feed, hot carcass weight and calculated yield grade.
Heavier, faster gaining and fatter cows will pay a higher feed bill. Cows
will be implanted on delivery to the feedlot. Yardage rate will be $.30 per
cow per day with no feed mark-up. Actual costs will be billed for each cow
with final total costs deducted from carcass payment.
Sponsored by
CHIPS Northwest and Iowa Lakes Controlled Grazing, Inc. in cooperation with
Iowa Lakes Community College & Iowa Beef Center
Contact:
Dennis DeWitt, email
dewitt@iastate.edu or telephone 712-336-3488
Rodent Control
Around Livestock Facilities
By Jerry Weiss, ISU
Extension Swine Field Specialists
Rats and mice
can be a major economic threat around swine and other livestock facilities.
They consume and contaminate feed and cause feed losses through the gnawing
of holes in feed holding and storage areas. They also have been implicated
in maintaining or spreading diseases.
For effective
control, we recommend an integrated pest management (IPM) approach that
incorporates the timely use of a variety of cost-effective control methods,
including: (1) sanitation, (2) rodent-proof construction, and (3) population
reduction. The first two are preventive measures. When an infestation
already exists, population reduction is typically needed. Reduction
techniques include include trapping, toxic baits, and fumigation. Another
important component of an effective IPM program is pest population
monitoring. Records of trapping success and measures of rodent activity will
help to determine the need for additional control efforts.
Although cats
and dogs may kill rodents, they do not provide effective long lasting
control in most circumstances.
In summary: 1.
Eliminate or reduce the number of places rodents can use for shelter. When
rodents have no place to hide or nest, they cannot thrive. 2. If rodents are
present use traps or rodenticides to reduce their numbers and maintain a
good control program. This consists of maintaining bait stations or traps.
ISU Extension
has a very good publication in the Pork Industry Handbook Titled
"Controlling Rats and Mice in Swine Facilities." (PIH-107).
Ask a
Specialist-
by Pete Olson, ISU
Extension Beef Field Specialist
Do you have
beef questions you don't have answers to? Questions on nutrition,
marketing, reproduction or early weaning? If so log onto the internet and go
to www.iowabeefcenter.org and click on "Ask a Beef Specialist" or Click on
"Frequently Asked Questions" for an archive of previously asked questions.
The answer to your question may have already been asked. If it hasn't, be
sure to send in your question by clicking on asking a specialist and
emailing it to Iowa State University Extension Beef Specialists. You will
be answered as soon as possible. So why are you waiting to learn the
answer to that question that has been keeping you up at nights. Here is an
example of aquestion recently sent in.
Q: Should I
crack the corn for my feedlot cattle or feed it whole?
A: You have
asked what might be the most common feedlot nutrition question we have
gotten over the last 20 years. The answer depends on the type of ration, and
the other feed ingredients. If it is dry corn, most research indicates that
there is little improvement in the digestibility of the corn in a finishing
ration over about 75% grain. Backgrounding rations and beef cow
supplementation of dry corn does respond to processing. Expect about a 5%
improvement in efficiency. Expect the same for high moisture corn,
regardless of the level of grain fed. Many a feces inspector has expressed
doubts and skepticism about this. Dr. Steve Loerch of Ohio State University
conducted a fascinating demonstration of whole corn feeding that really
explains what happens. What Dr. Loerch did (or more likely some lucky
graduate student) is count the kernels of corn
that actually went into, and out of a steer. The following are the results
of the demonstration with steers fed either dry or high moisture corn. The
steers on the dry corn ate 22,376 corn kernels. They excreted 1572 kernels.
At a total ration digestibility of 85% the cattle should have excreted about
a pound and a half of dry manure in a day. That manure would contain 1572
corn kernels even if the digestibility is 90%. That's a lot of corn in the
manure pile. And yes, if the corn were cracked it would still be there, just
not as visible.
There may be
not nutritional reasons to process the corn, however. If processing improves
the uniformity of particle size and aids mixing the total ration, improved
feedbunk management may result. In those cases the improved bunk management
may improve the efficiency of the cattle even though the corn digestibiltiy
may be no different.
High Moisture Corn Dry Corn
Number of steers 1 1
Corn intake, lb. 12.75
12.75
Supplement intake, lb. 2.25 2.25
Kernel intake 16,511 22,376
Fecal kernel output 65
1,572
Kernel "digestibility" 99.6% 93%
Starch in corn 72%
74%
Starch in fecal kernels 59% 61%
November 2002 FIELD
AND FEEDLOT
Iowa State University
Extension Connection
By Al Grigg, County
Extension Director
THANK YOU to
all who have responded with your e-mail address so we can send you the
Field and Feedlot publication
electronically. We would still ask those who wish to receive the
publication electronically to submit your e-mail address to us. The
procedure for you is simple and will take less than 60 seconds: [1] send an
e-mail to
agrigg@iastate.edu [2] type Field and Feedlot in the subject line and
[3] type in your e-mail address in the body. Then you will receive “Field
and Feedlot” via e-mail, saving postage costs, and you can read “Field and
Feedlot” on your computer.
Are you an
Iowa resident, 55 years of age or older, looking for a job but do not know
where to start?
Experience
Works, Inc. can provide help. Experience Works is funded by the US
Department of Labor and provides work and training to become employed.
Employers can also use the services of Experience Works by employing their
trainees. For more information on how Experience Works can help you call
toll free: 1-800-782-7519.
Iowa State
University Extension needs your input.
Iowa State
University Extension recognizes that communities are changing, business
trends are different, and technology is rapidly changing the way we
operate. A public forum is scheduled for input from the public on how Iowa
State University Extension can better serve Iowans through its education
programs and services. This opportunity for public input is scheduled for
Thursday, November 21 at Western Iowa Tech Community College in Cherokee
from 1-4 pm. Contact the Osceola County Extension Office for additional
information.
“Mastering
the Matrix” ICN on November 6.
Landowners,
livestock producers, and public officials are invited to attend an ICN
meeting at the Sibley High School on Wednesday, November 6 from 7-9 pm. The
“Matrix” is required by SF2263 passeed this year by the Iowa Legislature.
It is to be used by county boards of supervisors and the Iowa DNR to produce
a “statistically verifiable basis for determining whether to approve or
disapprove an appliation for construction of a livestock facility”. The
Iowa DNR is encouraging livestock producers to go above and beyond the law
in proposing new facilities. By using the matrix, 44 factors are outlined,
each of which is scored in subcategories for air, water, and community.
Producers can select from the cafeteria of options to bolster their scores
even though they may already meet state environmental requirements.
Speakers on
the ICN program include John Lawrence, Iowa State University Economist and
John Korslund, pork producer from Eagle Groove. Both served on the Master
Matrix Technical Advisory Committee and were involved in the development of
the contents of the matrix. Attendees will learn about the reasoning behind
the matrix proposal, definitions included in the matrix, factors in scoring
of new construction and siting an operation and manure management plan, and
the potential impacts on new construction and sitings by working through an
example farm. Producers will also learn the “logic” behind the matrix and
how to effectively communicate their concerns during the upcoming public
comment period. Mike Duffy, ISU Economist, will talk about the availability
of funding assistance to livestock producers provided by the Environmental
Quality Incentives Program [EQUIP]. Available program details,
qualification status and the NRCS approval process will be explained.
Producers will also hear of other manure matters and environmental
programs. Cost is $10 per person. Pre-registration is requested by calling
the Extension Office at 712-754-3648.
View as
Word Document
Back to Field and Feedlot Homepage |