ISU Extension News

Extension Communications
3614 Administrative Services Building
Ames, Iowa 50011-3614
(515) 294-9915

12/18/02

Contacts:
Michael Duffy, Economics, (515) 294-3000, mduffy@iastate.edu
Del Marks, Continuing Education and Communication Services, (515) 294-9807, delmarks@iastate.edu

Farmland Tops $2,000 an Acre Average Value in Iowa in 2002

AMES, Iowa -- The average value of an acre of farmland in Iowa reached $2,083 in 2002, the second highest figure reported since Iowa State University began conducting an annual survey of land values in 1941.

While values increased by more than 25 percent in a few counties, 19 counties showed a decrease from 2001 average values. The average increase over all 99 counties was 8.2 percent above the 2001 average value of $1,926. The greatest decrease was 8.7 percent in Ringgold County in south central Iowa.

Mike Duffy, ISU Extension farm economist who conducts the survey of real estate brokers, farm lenders, and others who work directly with the land markets, said the wide range in percentage changes in land values this year was unusual. In previous surveys, trends usually were similar in adjoining counties. This year, some counties showed substantial increases, while average values in adjoining counties decreased.

The $2,083 average value was second only to an average value of $2,147 reported in 1981. Duffy said that adjusting the 2002 figure for inflation puts it more in line with values that prevailed before the strong run-up in prices at the end of the 1970s.

The average value increased for the third year in a row after slight declines in 1998 and 1999. Duffy said investor demand may have been a factor in the price fluctuations this year. Purchases by investors ranged from 25 percent in the southeast Iowa crop reporting district to 48 percent in south central Iowa. Investor purchases often show more variability in price than purchases by farmers.

Low interest rates were mentioned by 52 percent of the participants in the 2002 survey as a positive influence on land values this year. Other positive factors included government farm payments, mentioned by 33 percent, crop yields (28 percent), improving commodity prices (24 percent), stock market declines (17 percent), scarcity of land on the market (15 percent), and strong demand from investors (14 percent).

Negative factors that helped keep prices down this year included poor commodity prices, mentioned by 14 percent, farm economy variability (13 percent), the general economic outlook and world conditions (13 percent), and uncertainty about government programs (11 percent).

The 8.2 percent increase in overall land values was lower than a 13.0 percent increase in low grade land, which averaged $1,322 per acre in 2002, up $157 from the year before. Medium grade land increased $156 per acre to $1,924, an increase of 8.8 percent, while high grade land averaged $2,576 per acre, an increase of 7.0 percent over 2001.

The highest land values in the state were in the east central crop reporting district where the average for all grades was $2,547 per acre. The lowest district average was $1,211 per acre in south central Iowa. South Central Iowa led the state in percentage increase however, with land values rising an average of 16.6 percent last year.

The highest value in an individual county was $3,379 per acre in Scott County in east central Iowa, while the lowest value in an individual county was $823 per acre in Decatur County in south central Iowa. Jones County had an increase of $581 per acre for the largest dollar increase, while the largest dollar decrease was $165 an acre in Audubon County. Percentage changes ranged from an increase of 29.5 percent in Des Moines County to a decrease of 8.7 in Ringgold County.

Forty-nine percent of the survey respondents said the number of sales this year was about the same as last year, while 28 percent said there were more sales in 2002, and 23 percent said there were fewer sales.

About 1,100 copies of the survey are mailed each year with respondents asked to report values as of Nov. 1. Average response is 500 to 600 completed surveys, with 591 returned this year. Eighty-four percent of those responding also participated in last year’s survey.

Only the state average and the averages for the nine crop reporting districts are based directly on data collected in the survey. The county estimates are derived through a procedure that combines ISU survey results with data from the U.S. Census of Agriculture. The ISU survey is the only one of several conducted throughout the year that reports data for all 99 counties.

The survey is sponsored by the Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station at ISU, with results reported by ISU Extension. Duffy was assisted in the project this year by Darnell Smith, extension program specialist in economics.

Additional information on the 2002 survey is available on the ISU Extension Web site at http://www.extension.iastate.edu/emms/land2002/.

-30-

ml: imajor, isufarm

Survey Results by Crop Reporting District
 

2002

2001

2001-2002 Change

District

$/acre

$/acre

$

%

Northwest

2,434

2,240

194

8.7%

North Central

2,367

2,240

127

5.7%

Northeast

2,149

1,950

199

10.2%

West Central

2,101

1,969

132

6.7%

Central

2,392

2,246

146

6.5%

East Central

2,547

2,324

223

9.6%

Southwest

1,632

1,511

121

8.0%

South Central

1,211

1,039

172

16.6%

Southeast

1,808

1,705

103

6.0%

State Avg.

2,083

1,926

157

8.2%

Survey Results By County:

 

2002

2001

 

2001-2002

County Name

$/acre

$/acre

$ Change

% Change

Adair

1,333

1,264

69

5.5%

Adams

1,245

1,275

-30

-2.4%

Allamakee

1,548

1,314

234

17.8%

Appanoose

946

853

93

10.9%

Audubon

1,748

1,913

-165

-8.6%

Benton

2,665

2,214

451

20.4%

Black Hawk

2,783

2,459

324

13.2%

Boone

2,670

2,373

297

12.5%

Bremer

2,479

2,268

211

9.3%

Buchanan

2,291

2,231

60

2.7%

Buena Vista

2,581

2,356

225

9.6%

Butler

2,434

2,164

270

12.5%

Calhoun

2,471

2,398

73

3.0%

Carroll

2,535

2,103

432

20.5%

Cass

1,690

1,718

-28

-1.6%

Cedar

2,919

2,516

403

16.0%

Cerro Gordo

2,619

2,252

367

16.3%

Cherokee

2,114

2,086

28

1.3%

Chickasaw

2,162

1,821

341

18.7%

Clarke

978

1,005

-27

-2.7%

Clay

2,468

2,174

294

13.5%

Clayton

1,970

1,804

166

9.2%

Clinton

2,575

2,076

499

24.0%

Crawford

1,942

1,883

59

3.1%

Dallas

2,447

2,028

419

20.7%

Davis

1,100

1,108

-8

-0.7%

Decatur

823

798

25

3.1%

Delaware

2,299

2,408

-109

-4.5%

Des Moines

2,388

1,845

543

29.4%

Dickinson

2,019

1,999

20

1.0%

Dubuque

2,570

2,177

393

18.1%

Emmet

2,509

2,241

268

12.0%

Fayette

2,030

2,076

-46

-2.2%

Floyd

2,123

2,091

32

1.5%

Franklin

2,386

2,216

170

7.7%

Fremont

1,923

1,665

258

15.5%

Greene

2,408

2,076

332

16.0%

Grundy

2,862

2,450

412

16.8%

Guthrie

1,742

1,729

13

0.8%

Hamilton

2,535

2,519

16

0.6%

Hancock

2,239

2,274

-35

-1.5%

Hardin

2,219

2,255

-36

-1.6%

Harrison

1,897

1,789

108

6.0%

Henry

2,219

1,785

434

24.3%

Howard

1,812

1,640

172

10.5%

Humboldt

2,464

2,417

47

1.9%

Ida

2,371

2,120

251

11.8%

Iowa

1,855

1,874

-19

-1.0%

Jackson

2,033

1,834

199

10.9%

Jasper

2,027

1,956

71

3.6%

Jefferson

1,593

1,380

213

15.4%

Johnson

2,466

2,380

86

3.6%

Jones

2,566

1,985

581

29.3%

Keokuk

1,899

1,683

216

12.8%

Kossuth

2,557

2,337

220

9.4%

Lee

1,758

1,632

126

7.7%

Linn

2,686

2,498

188

7.5%

Louisa

1,948

2,079

-131

-6.3%

Lucas

1,097

911

186

20.4%

Lyon

2,453

2,024

429

21.2%

Madison

1,592

1,539

53

3.4%

Mahaska

1,754

1,721

33

1.9%

Marion

1,571

1,648

-77

-4.7%

Marshall

2,622

2,066

556

26.9%

Mills

1,727

1,819

-92

-5.1%

Mitchell

2,347

2,049

298

14.5%

Monona

1,744

1,627

117

7.2%

Monroe

1,043

1,126

-83

-7.4%

Montgomery

1,697

1,546

151

9.8%

Muscatine

2,332

2,271

61

2.7%

O’Brien

2,670

2,498

172

6.9%

Osceola

2,407

2,137

270

12.6%

Page

1,677

1,394

283

20.3%

Palo Alto

2,311

2,177

134

6.2%

Plymouth

2,278

2,213

65

2.9%

Pocahontas

2,546

2,381

165

6.9%

Polk

2,262

2,078

184

8.9%

Pottawattamie

2,055

1,921

134

7.0%

Poweshiek

1,817

1,868

-51

-2.7%

Ringgold

884

968

-84

-8.7%

Sac

2,494

2,246

248

11.0%

Scott

3,379

3,233

146

4.5%

Shelby

1,989

1,900

89

4.7%

Sioux

2,859

2,368

491

20.7%

Story

2,623

2,433

190

7.8%

Tama

2,153

2,014

139

6.9%

Taylor

1,347

1,117

230

20.6%

Union

1,367

1,168

199

17.0%

Van Buren

1,217

1,222

-5

-0.4%

Wapello

1,639

1,302

337

25.9%

Warren

1,930

1,656

274

16.5%

Washington

2,375

2,151

224

10.4%

Wayne

1,100

870

230

26.4%

Webster

2,471

2,484

-13

-0.5%

Winnebago

2,280

2,049

231

11.3%

Winneshiek

1,696

1,692

4

0.2%

Woodbury

1,878

1,731

147

8.5%

Worth

2,027

2,063

-36

-1.7%

Wright

2,565

2,490

75

3.0%

 


Extension programs are available to all without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, age, or disability.

News Menu | ISU Extension