Family Resiliency
![]()
Thomas R. Lee, Jay A. Mancini, C. Sue Miles, and Lydia I. Marek
Note: If you wish to print the matrix on one 8 1/2 by 11 inch
page, change your printer's paper orientation to landscape and
print at approximately 65%. (Exact percentage may vary depending
on your printer.)
| Communities & Schools | Family Resource Development Association | Hampton Family Resource Project | Jackie Robinson Center For Physical Culture | Project Uplift | Southside Boys and Girls Club | Youth Opportunities Unlimited | |
| 1. Community-based and carried out in collaboration with many community partners | 70+ agencies collaborate decentralized services for youth and families. | "Patch" teams of 28 human service agencies and private and public organizations target neighborhoods of 5,000 to 10,000 people. | Research based standards yet community based with individually assessed plans. | Clearly targeted community resources from public, private sector involved. | Program offices, and family and child support centers are in housing complex. | Public and private partners support clear goals established with all involved. | Opportunities for youth build on community strengths. |
| 2. Comprehensive in scope, based on an ecological view of individuals, families and communities | Mentoring and tutoring focus on need-based support. | School site includes 5 family resource centers located in a daycare center, neighborhood center, and schools provide classes and activities to support individuals and families. | Social, physical and emotional support are provided until children are ready for school. | All youth have special support in science, math counseling and activities they choose. | Formal and informal education and support services are tailored to fit need. | Homework support, physical activities and parent involvement nurture and strengthen youth. | Diverse experiences for youth and parents expand their support base and networks. |
| 3. Inclusive of program participants in program planning, delivery and ongoing participatory evaluation to support participants in addressing the critical issues that affect their lives | Parent and child surveys are conducted on an annual basis. Parent and school site councils guide direction. |
One to one and feedback sessions support program direction. | Home visitors assure feedback and planning with families and providers. | Parent advisories are actively involved at each site. Activities involve the whole family. | Truly an empowerment model that works for participants. They are getting jobs, getting evaluation and moving on. | Routine focus groups with children and parents support program directions. | Youth are actively involved in selection of activities. Parents help select family activities. |
| 4. Preventive, through successfully interfacing service and education and recognizing and building on participants' strengths to enhance skills and foster empowerment | Scholarships and other incentives support continued growth.
Dental and physical exams are a prevention plus. |
Staff workers help negotiate systems and serve as mentors. | Health care and parenting support family resiliency. | Clearly identified social, cultural and intellectual development
builds on strengths. Parents contract with program. |
Participants learn about their rights and responsibility and how to address their needs. | Values, life skills and support in school work and physical activities help to prevent future problems. | Interpersonal skills, adult relationships, positive peer associations and involvement in community provide motivations and support achievements. |
| 5. Developmentally appropriate and based on current research | Activities and classes are built on the need of youth served. | Built on research based British "Patch" system. | High standards for the program are research based. | Involved and growing youth and parents determine activities. | Action research keeps program on target. | Youth activities, resiliency and a holistic approach with families support growth. | Know protection factors are reinforced throughout the program process and curriculums. |
| 6. Accessible to participants with a mix of program deliveries based on the needs of participants | On site programs for youth and families, utilize school and community resources. | Worker help to advocate and negotiate for identified service and education. | Home visitors connect families with the right mix to support over time. | Programs and services at school sites support growth and development for youth for up to six hours, 3-5 days a week. | Family resource support with services and day care are located in housing complex. | Youth identify with their activities, and health and homework support target through well-being. | Transportaition is provided for popular activity sites to reach youth and educational support compliments growth needs. |
| 7. Accountable to stakeholders and able to demonstrate positive outcomes in participants and community environments | Evaluation instrument from UNC-Chapel Hill supports planning and success documentation. | Research tie with U of I and evaluation on site provide for information and accountability needs the right combination of constituency-building, and standard setting involves all partners. | The program is recognized by city and county government as pivotal to the well-being of the community. | Celebrations showcasing program impact are frequent, executed with marketing expertise and stakeholders given high visibility as well. | National focus on "Best Practices" continues to examine practices and enhances the development of the family support field. | Program leaders keep success stories in front of the public on a continuous basis. | Strong evaluation component with UNA assures impact on resiliency factors. |
| 8. The leadership and vision of program directors and advisories guide the responsive change and growth of the program. | Individualized plans address social and academic needs and
suggest needed change. National and local buyins approach. |
A shared vision of community based support and development guide program directions. | Visible decision-makers in the community who make things happen are the steering committee. | Small central staff with high level of expertise in program and community relationships guide a high standard, clearly focused program. | Leadership is shared across the spectrum of providers and consumers, and a shared philosophy guides the program. | Consistent long-term leadership has developed significant partnership and shared vision for programs. | A shared vision with the Director of Extension and community leaders undergirds visionary program leadership. |