
Extension to
Communities
Values Clothesline
Controversy, Conflict, and Values
by Norm Riggs
Iowa State University Extension
Community Development Field Specialist
Controversy and conflicts arise when there
are shortages of certain
resources, such as money, power, time, space, influence. They
also arise because we are not all the same. We have different
values, beliefs, experiences, skills, knowledge, self-interests.
Here is an outline of a process called
"Values Clothesline" that can be used to help a group of
people see how beliefs, experience, and knowledge lead
people to make very different value judgements. A PowerPoint presentation (118k) of this material is
also available.
- Numbers from 1 to 10 are taped along one wall of the meeting room
before the meeting starts.
- The facilitator hands out a score
sheet. The facilitator reads 8 to 10
value-laden statements. For each
statement read, the audience writes down a number between 1 and 10,
with 1 being strongly disagree and 10 being strongly agree.
- After all questions have been read and scored by the participants,
a couple of ground rules for discussion should be explained.
- They must be active listeners, really trying to
hear what other participants are saying.
- They can't jump in and argue with the values and opinions
of another participant.
- The facilitator reads a question. The participants stand
near the number that corresponds to their answer. (Participants
are duty-bound to stand where their number is and not let where other
people are standing change their position.)
- The facilitator asks the people standing under the number
1 why they are standing there. Group discussion. Ask the people
standing under some of the other numbers why they are standing
there. After people have expressed their views, ask if anyone
wants to shift or change where they are standing.
- Two observations:
- a. things are usually not black and white
- b. "huddle-in-the-middle" -- no strong opinion --
can see both sides
Some topics are too hot to handle --- abortion.
- The facilitator should ask the participants what they
observed in this process.
Is this an issue that can be resolved?
Example: county music vs. jazz
- Human Thought Triangle -- most people are
driven by faith, not science.
- Faith: emotion, values, opinions, religion. How you
feel about an issue, and cannot prove it.
(abortion)
- Science: empirical, proven facts, research-based,
scientific.
- Politics: Reactive corner of the triangle.
Self-interests -- jobs, money, votes, power, harassment.
- Divide into two groups. Using a local issue, draw
circles on faith-science-politics triangle.
Example
- How is this issue going to play out in the community?
If we want an unbiased view, what part of the triangle do
we want to be the largest for the public? If we want people
to be swayed to a particular point of view, where do we want
people to be in the triangle?
- What did we learn? How can we apply this to our issue here?
- Controversy is not bad; in fact, it's a necessary
reality. The challenge is to recognize it and deal
with it in a constructive manner.
- The goal(s) and strategies for solving a problem
are determined by people's values and beliefs.
- Values are the most prominent factor in addressing
controversy. Logic and facts often take a back
seat to emotion.
- Don't assume others share your values or beliefs.
The values clothesline underscores this fact.
- Controversy must be addressed before consensus
and constructive action can be taken.