Odor Control for Dry Manure
Storage Practices - Landscaping
| Pro |
Con |
| Visually pleasing |
Time to establish or costly to plant established trees |
| Traps multiple gases and odors |
Potential to have reduced effectiveness over time |
Landscaping can reduce the emission of housing odors, as well
as odors generated by other components of the livestock operation,
beyond the property line. Landscaping acts as a permeable filter
for particle emissions, slowing the particulate movement and diluting
the concentrations of emissions. Trees and shrubs act as biofilters
for odorous compounds that are attached to fine particles. By landscaping
with both a treeline and a row of shrubs, particles at various
heights within a plume can be adsorbed. To maximize absorption,
landscape materials with large surface areas are recommended. Trees
and shrubs placed around the facility should not impede building
ventilation and therefore are often located on the property lines.
Costs associated with landscaping will vary
depending on selected trees and shrubs, and on perimeter size. The
estimate of a shelterbelt planted around a 3000-head hog facility
using "higher" cost trees ($25 per shrub or tree), calculated as
$0.68 per pig for one year, amortized over 20 years at 5 percent,
is just $0.09 per pig. These costs include maintenance costs. In
addition to acting as a natural filtration system for odors, landscaping
has the additional benefits of being aesthetically pleasing to the
eye and of restricting the view of the operation. So,
while documented effectiveness on emissions is scarce, the value
of creating a facility that is pleasant to the eye cannot be underestimated. Extension Publications
Abstracts, Conference Proceedings, Presentations and Reports
Journal Articles
Newsletter Articles
Other Links
|