Odor Control for Dry Manure
Storage Practices - Composting
| Pro |
Con |
| Value-added product if market is available |
Can be labor, equipment, and management intensive to keep compost time down |
Composting can control odors because it
maintains an aerobic environment in the manure. Disadvantages
of composting include the high levels of management required
to keep the process timely: minimal management leads to slow
decomposition whereas intensive management can lead to quick
decomposition. Another disadvantage is the need to bring in a
bulking agent (newspaper, straw, wood chips) to maintain a balance
of carbon to nitrogen (C:N) during the decomposition process.
Loss of N to the atmosphere, primarily as ammonia, is a problem
that needs to be weighed carefully when considering this option,
particularly when controlling ammonia emissions is also an objective.
Facilities should be covered to prevent runoff due to precipitation,
and if built on a compacted area, it will prevent leaching of nutrients.
Odor reduction benefits are not will documented, despite conventional
thought that composting can be an effective control practice for
odor. Cost include construction of the site with a compacted floor
and roof, and continuous maintenance of the compost, which involves
equipment of appropriate size to turn (aerate) the pile. For example,
a 4-foot x 6-foot x 3-foot deep pile may be turned more properly
with a small skid loader whereas a considerably large pile would
be better handled with a front-end loader.
Composting is a better option for operations that handle solid manure.
Liquid systems will require some type of drying process or large
amounts of bulking agents to avoid odor during the composting process. Extension Publications
Abstracts, Conference Proceedings, Presentations and Reports
Journal Articles
Newsletter Articles
Other Links
|