H2S
Control for Animal Housing Systems with Liquid Manure - Filtration
and Biofiltration
| Pro |
Con |
| Traps multiple gases and odor |
Needs good maintenance to operate properly |
| Versatile for mechanically ventilated operations |
Potential to have a limited life effectiveness |
Filters function by trapping particles and emissions.
Biofilters not only trap emissions but also provide an environment
for aerobic biological degradation of trapped compounds. Biofilters
have been developed to reduce emissions from deep-pit manure ventilation
exhaust, and, to a lesser extent, from the building exhaust. Although
mechanical filtration may be costly, biofiltration can be a low-cost
means of effectively reducing exhaust odors. Biofiltration costs
for a 700-head farrow-to-wean swine facility are estimated at $0.25
per piglet, amortized over a 3-year life of the biofilter. Hydrogen
sulfide reductions at that operation exceeded 90 percent, and similar
reductions occur in odor (90 percent) and ammonia emissions (74
percent). Similar hydrogen sulfide and odor reductions were observed
using biofiltration on a dairy facility. Because of the dust generated
in the building, biofilter performance on a poultry facility was
poorer (< 40 percent hydrogen sulfide and odor reduction).
Biofilters must be designed to provide suitable
conditions for the growth of a mixture of aerobic bacteria within
the biofilter. These bacteria will degrade the odorous compounds
to less odorous end products. Oxygen concentration, temperature,
residence time, and moisture content are among the parameters that
must be considered when building a biofilter. Although management
must be taken into consideration, it is clear that low-cost biofiltration
systems ($150-200 per 1,000 cfm of air treated) can be implemented
in livestock housing facilities using mechanical ventilation.
Extension Publications
Abstracts, Conference Proceedings, Presentations and Reports
Journal Articles
Newsletter Articles
Other Links
|