H2S Control
for Animal Housing Systems with Dry Manure - Landscaping
| Pro |
Con |
| Visually pleasing |
Time to establish or costly to plant established trees |
| Traps multiple gases and odor |
Potential to have reduced effectiveness over time |
Landscaping may reduce the emission of housing odors, as well
as odors generated by other components of the livestock operation,
beyond the property line. Landscaping acts as a permeable filter
for particle emissions, slowing the particulate movement and diluting
the concentrations of emissions. Trees and shrubs act as biofilters
for odorous compounds that are attached to fine particles. By landscaping
with both a treeline and a row of shrubs, particles at various
heights within a plume can be adsorbed. To maximize absorption,
landscape materials with large surface areas are recommended. Trees
and shrubs placed around the facility should not impede building
ventilation and therefore are often located on the property lines.
Costs associated with landscaping will vary
depending on selected trees and shrubs, and on perimeter size.
The estimate of a shelterbelt planted around a 3000-head hog
facility using "higher" cost trees
($25 per shrub or tree), calculated as $0.68 per pig for one year,
amortized over 20 years at 5 percent, is just $0.09 per pig. These
costs include maintenance costs. In addition to acting as a natural
filtration system for odors, landscaping has the additional benefits
of being aesthetically pleasing to the eye and of restricting the
view of the operation. So, while documented effectiveness on emissions
is scarce, the value of creating a facility that is pleasant to the eye should not be underestimated.
Extension Publications
Abstracts, Conference Proceedings, Presentations and Reports
Journal Articles
Newsletter Articles
Other Links
|
