Dust and Particulates - Liquid Systems

Home Page > Dust and Particulates Home Page > Liquid Systems > Storage > Permeable Covers

Dust and Particulate Control for Liquid Manure Storage Practices - Permeable Covers

Pro Con
Cost efficient for benefits gained Replacement over time (annually in some cases)
Variety of options available Biocovers may have removal issues

Permeable covers, or biocovers, act as biofilters on the top of manure storage areas. Materials often used as covers include straws, cornstalks, peat moss, foam, geotextile fabric, and Leka rock. Permeable biocovers reduce dust by acting as a barrier. Although dust reductions are undocumented, reports of odor reductions of 40-50 percent and greater are common when various straw materials are used. An 85 percent reduction in odor has been noted following the use of a floating mat or corrugated materials.

Costs for biocovers vary widely depending on material used and method of application. Straws and cornstalks cost approximately $0.10 per square foot, applied; peat moss and foam cost about $0.26 per square foot, and Leka rock is approximately $2.50 per square foot for a 3-inch layer. Leka rock is a product of Norway , thereby requiring considerable shipping costs ($5-$6 per cubic foot). The cost to cover a 1.5-acre earthen storage was $6,000 whereas an above-ground tank (0.2 acre) was $500, for the same material.

Cover depth is a very important for permeable covers. Most recommendations for straw and stalk covers suggest a minimum of 8-inch depth, preferably 10- to 12-inch depth of coverage on a manure storage surface, whereas Leka rock requires only a 3-inch depth. New covers (except Leka rock) need to be applied at least annually, and one study showed that only 50 percent of the straw cover remained four months after installation. However, an operation in Minnesota employed a 1/8-inch thick geotextile material that cost $0.25 per square foot, plus installation costs. Straw was added on top of the geotextile cover for additional odor control. Management and re-investment costs, and the removal of large, fibrous material during storage cleanout must be considered before selecting this option.

Extension Publications

Abstracts, Conference Proceedings, Presentations and Reports

Journal Articles

Newsletter Articles

Other Links

 

Pork checkoffIowa State University Extension

|Iowa State University| |Iowa State University College of Agriculture| |Iowa State University Extension|
|Feedback to Angie Rieck-Hinz| |Web Site Questions|
Copyright © 2002-2007, Iowa State University. All rights reserved.