Agriculture and Natural Resources Extension
Iowa State University
Title of Success Story |
Young Afghanistan and Pakistan Extension Professionals Strengthened Skills In Extension Under US Model |
Public Value (now or future) |
U.S. Total Economic and Military aid to Afghanistan is $11,447,000,000 and to Pakistan $2,854,000,000. This is a total of 14,301 Million dollars per year. You reduce the military aid by pulling troops out of the country. So how do you reduce the economic aid? One way is to increase their agriculture productivity. The United States developed our agriculture through the Extension System. |
RELEVANCE |
Prof. Dr. Iqrar Ahmad Khan, Vice Chancellor, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad-Pakistan said that “In a developing world including Pakistan, the aggregate average yields are only 20% of the developed world. Beyond increasing productivity, there is need for significant reduction in postharvest wastage. The past 50 years have seen food booms because of better varieties, more and more taming of water, agro-chemicals and mechanization because of rapid growth of knowledge. The future lies with successful integration of genetically modified crops. University’s role to empower the agriculture sector for socio-economic development must have community building schemes and pilot projects in place. Small holders and pastoral communities are the most affected and disadvantaged segments of society. We need to work for better dry land agriculture and range management for them.” |
RESPONSE |
Four universities, Iowa State, UC Davis, University of Maryland, Washington State University, with a grant from USAID, held a 5 day workshop. Forty two participants from Afghanistan and Pakistan increased their knowledge in US Extension know-how. Each day focused on a skill used in Extension to transfer knowledge to agriculture producers. Day one; Learning styles. Day two; Conducting needs assessments. Day three; Finding, developing, validating, and distributing research based information. Day four; Designing and developing various forms of communication and delivery aids. |
RESULTS (Outcomes: specific changes that occurred in Learning, Actions, Conditions; how outcomes were measured) |
What happened on Day five? All participants chose a partner, at the beginning of the week, to develop a project that could be used in their Extension work. Each group presented their project to the whole group. The project was then reviewed by the other participants and instructors. Twenty projects were developed, shared, evaluated and used in their Extension work. |
Desired Changes |
Each day an evaluation was used to see if the students were learning and understanding the Extension skills delivered by the teaching team. Here are some comments and survey results;
|
Extension Lead(s) |
Terry Steinhart |
Your Position |
__X__ Field _____Campus _____Both |
POW # and Team |
_____100 Corn and Soybean Production and Protection |
ANR Priority (select all that apply) |
__X__ Global Food Security and Hunger |
Knowledge Areas: (USDA categories) |
|
Continuing Story |
___X__ No _____ Yes (If continuing, what story?) |
Major Partners or Collaborators |
USAID, Iowa State University, UC Davis, University of Maryland, Washington State University |
Where story took place |
Global Extension Work, Pakistan |
Fiscal Year |
2011 |
Multi-state or Integrated (Ext + Research) |
|
Funding Source |
USAID Grant |
Keywords |
Afghanistan, Pakistan, Global Food Security and Hunger, Extension skills |
Page last updated:
March 19, 2012
Page maintained by Julie Honeick, jhoneick@iastate.edu