Agriculture and Natural Resources Extension
Iowa State University
Title of Success Story |
Soil Fertility – Understanding the Basics |
Public Value (now or future) |
Improved crop production through good soil fertility management means more dollars produced per acre, which has a ripple effect in the local economy. Additionally, reduction of soils with excessive nutrients reduces the risk of off-site nutrient enrichment in Iowa’s surface waters. |
RELEVANCE |
Growers and agronomic advisors need to know the research of better soil nutrient management in order to maximize yield potential, at the same time reducing the risk of additional off-site movement of nutrients than cause problems for surface water quality. |
RESPONSE |
Two workshops were held, one in 2010, another in 2011, to teach the basics of soil fertility for crop producers. This one day workshop was designed to look closely at the basics of P and K in crop production, how recommendations are developed, calculate the rates of application, talk about the difference between pounds and units, and discuss different management theories. We then discussed N management, forms, how loss occurs. and N management tools. Reviewing soil lime needs followed, with a review of research results to lime applications, and a discussion and practice problems on ECCE calculations for different forms of lime. At the end of the day we spent a little time on micronutrient responses in Iowa. A limit of 40 was set for each year, and we trained over 80 in that time period. |
RESULTS (Outcomes: specific changes that occurred in Learning, Actions, Conditions; how outcomes were measured) |
A survey was sent to 79 past participants in the workshop, with 36 returned (46%). Surveys were sent 1 to 2 years after workshop attendance. All respondents felt more confident discussing fertilizer application rates and recommendations. 92% are now more involved in making their own recommendations. 61% have changed fertilizer application rates based on what they learned. 33% lowered application rates but maintained yields, 42% increased fertilizer rates but increased yields, and one indicated they applied the same amount of fertilizer, they just shifted which areas to which fertilizer was applied. 81% indicated they wanted to meet again to answer more questions about managing soil fertility. |
Desired Changes |
Learning – better understanding of responsiveness of soil to fertilizer addition – or what happens when it is not added, depending on soil test levels. |
Extension Lead(s) |
Joel DeJong, NW Iowa Extension Field Agronomist - Lead |
Your Position |
___X__Field __X___Campus _____Both |
POW # and Team |
__x___100 Corn and Soybean Production and Protection |
ANR Priority (select all that apply) |
__x___Global Food Security and Hunger |
Knowledge Areas: (USDA categories) |
|
Continuing Story |
_____ No __X___ Yes (If continuing, what story?) |
Major Partners or Collaborators |
|
Where story took place |
NW Iowa regional meetings. |
Fiscal Year |
2010 & 2011 |
Multi-state or Integrated (Ext + Research) |
|
Funding Source |
Self-funded by workshop participants |
Keywords |
Soil fertility, fertilizer management |
Page last updated:
February 7, 2012
Page maintained by Julie Honeick, jhoneick@iastate.edu