Extension Lead(s) |
William Edwards, Extension Economist (state specialist) |
Your Position |
_____Field |
POW # and Team |
_____100 Corn and Soybean Production and Protection |
ANR Priority (select all that apply) |
__X___Global Food Security and Hunger |
Title of Success Story |
Average Crop Revenue Election (ACRE) Decision Tool |
Continuing Story |
___X__ No _____ Yes (If continuing, what story?) |
Knowledge Areas: (USDA categories) |
Economics of Agricultural Production and Farm Management. |
Desired Changes |
Iowa farmers will have a simple and convenient to use to analyze the potential results from enrolling or not enrolling in ACRE, over the next 4 years, on their own farms. |
RELEVANCE |
A year ago Iowa farmers were faced with the decision of whether to continue with the traditional version of the Direct and Counter-cyclical commodity risk program (DCP) from the Farm Service Agency (FSA), or to enroll in a new option called the Average Crop Revenue Election (ACRE). The new program offered a chance to put a floor under gross revenue instead of price, but also required producers to give up some of the benefits of the old program. |
RESPONSE |
I developed a decision tool file (Excel spreadsheet) that showed the potential costs and returns to enrolling in the ACRE program over the next 4 years, under a random distribution of yield and price scenarios. The tool allowed farmers to input values corresponding to each individual FSA farm unit under their management. The decision tool was posted on the ISU Ag Decision Maker website so that it would be freely accessible to anyone. It was available approximately 9 months before FSA made their analysis tool available to the public. |
RESULTS (Outcomes: specific changes that occurred in Learning, Actions, Conditions; how outcomes were measured) |
Based on a follow-up random mail survey of 3,384 Iowa farmers (356 usable responses) who had enrolled in previous FSA commodity programs, 24% used an electronic spreadsheet to analyze their ACRE enrollment decision. 13% used the ISU Extension decision tool and 11% used other electronic decision tools). The producers who used the ISUE tool enrolled an average of 40% of the FSA farm units they operated in 2009 into the ACRE program. Producers who used a spreadsheet tool from another source enrolled 36% of their farms, and the producers who did not do a spreadsheet analysis enrolled only 15% of their farms in ACRE. This indicates a significant behavior change related to the use of an analysis tool developed by ISU Extension. |
Public Value (now or future) |
The long-term results from enrolling in the ACRE program will not be known until 2012, but farms that are enrolled have a relatively high safety net for their gross revenue, at a small annual cost. In the event of a severe decline in crop yields and/or prices producers will be able to maintain their incomes and continue to support farm input suppliers, lending institutions and ag processors in their communities. |
Major Partners or Collaborators |
Farm Service Agency |
Where story took place |
Statewide |
Fiscal Year |
2010 |
Multi-state or Integrated (Ext + Research) |
Extension + Research |
Funding Source |
Iowa Ag and Home Ec Experiment Station |
Keywords |
Farm Bill, Risk, ACRE, Financial, |
Page last updated:
July 5, 2011
Page maintained by Julie Honeick, jhoneick@iastate.edu