| Strengthening Families
Program For Parents and Youth 10 - 14 (SFP 10-14) was developed
for Project
Family, a research endeavor of the Institute
for Social and Behavioral Research at Iowa State University.
Project Family was directed by Richard Spoth, Ph.D., working
in collaboration with Virginia Molgaard, Ph.D., and supported
by Iowa State University Extension to Families.
SFP 10-14 resulted from a major revision of the
earlier Strengthening Families Program (SFP) developed by Karol
Kumpfer and associates at the University of Utah. The original
SFP was developed for substance-abusing parents and their children
6 to 10 years of age. *The program described in this Web site
should not be confused with the original Strengthening Families
Program (SFP) for younger children and parents. Note that in the
published articles the SPF 10-14 is often referred to as the Iowa
Strengthening Families Program (ISFP).
Timeline
- Original SFP developed in 1986 and tested
with diverse audiences, University of Utah, 1986 - 1998
- Major revision of SFP for pre- and young adolescents,
1993 (Originally called the Iowa Strengthening Families Program
- ISFP)
- Scientific evaluation of ISFP in rural community
settings, Project Family, 1993 - 2008
- Focus groups and revision of ISFP for diverse
families, 1997, renamed Strengthening Families Program: For
Parents and Youth 10-14
- Scientific evaluation of SFP 10-14 with Life
Skills Training,Capable Families and Youth Project, 1997- 2007
- Scientific evaluation of SFP 10-14 with African
American families, Harambee Project, 1997 - 2002 Scientific
evaluation of SFP 10-14 and community infrastructure,
- Promoting School-Community-University Partnerships
for Capable Youth and Families and Positive Youth Development
(PROSPER), 2002 - 2007
- Ongoing training across the country, 1997-
present
- International Adaptations: Sweeden, U.K.,
Central America, Spain, Turkey, Greece, Italy, Norway, 2002-present
*Differences Between SFP and SFP 10-14
The programs are the same in format and overall goals; differences
between the two programs include intended audience (age and degree
of risk), risk and protective factors addressed, teaching methods
and topics.
Theoretical Background
Several etiological and intervention models (e.g., a biophysical
vulnerability model, a resiliency model, and a family process
model linking family stress and adolescent adjustment) influenced
the development of SFP 10–14. For more information, see:
Competency Training--The Strengthening Families Program: For Parents
and Youth 10-14, Virginia K. Molgaard, Richard L. Spoth,
and Cleve Redmond, Juvenile Justice Bulletin, August 2000
|