
1998 IOWA LAND VALUE SURVEY: OVERVIEW
Prepared by Michael D. Duffy, agricultural extension economist, Jay Lillywhite, and Nick Mastrogiannopoulos, Iowa State University, December 1998.
1.0 History and Purpose of the Land Value Survey.
1.1 The survey was initiated in 1941 and is sponsored annually by the Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station, Iowa State University. Only the state average and the district averages are based directly on the ISU survey data. The county estimates are derived by using a procedure that combines the ISU survey results with data from the U.S. Census of Agriculture. The survey was conducted by Michael Duffy with assistance from Jay Lillywhite and Nick Mastrogiannopoulos.1.2 The survey is intended to provide information on general land value trends, geographical land price relationships and factors influencing the Iowa land market.
1.3 The survey is based on reports by licensed real estate brokers and selected individuals considered to be knowledgeable of land market conditions. Approximately 1100 surveys are mailed each year. Normally 500-600 completed surveys are returned. The 1998 survey is based on 589 usable responses.
1.4 Participants in the survey are asked to estimate the value of high, medium and low grade land in their county. Comparative sales and other factors are taken into account by the respondents in making these value estimates.
2.0 Analysis by State.
2.1 The 1998 state average for all grades of land was estimated to be $1801 per acre.2.2 The decrease in the state value was $36 per acre from 1997.
2.3 The percentage decrease was 1.9 percent from 1997.
3.0 Analysis by Crop Reporting District.
3.1 The highest land values were reported for Central Iowa, $2192 per acre.3.2 The lowest land values were estimated for South Central Iowa, $948 per acre.
3.3 The greatest percentage increase was in Northeast Iowa, 2.1 percent.
3.4 The greatest percentage decrease was in Central Iowa, 4.5 percent.
4.0 Analysis by Counties.
4.1 The highest value was estimated for Scott county, $2859 per acre.4.2 The lowest value was in Decatur county, $757 per acre.
4.3 The greatest dollar increase was $35 in Fayette county.
4.4 The greatest dollar decrease was $121 in Hamilton county.
4.5 The greatest percentage increases were in Allamakee and Clayton counties, 2.3 percent.
4.6 The greatest percentage decrease was in Boone County, 4.7 percent.
5.0 Analysis by Quality of Land.
5.1 Low grade land in the state averaged $1030 per acre and showed an 1.1 percent decrease or $12 per acre.5.2 Medium grade land averaged $1638 per acre and showed a 1.8 percent decrease or $30 per acre.
5.3 High grade land averaged $2284 per acre and showed a decrease of 1.9 percent or $44 per acre.
6.0 Major Factors Influencing the Real Estate Market.
Survey respondents listed both positive and negative factors influencing the land market. The respondents listed multiple factors in most cases.
6.1 There were 3 positive factors listed by over 10 percent of the respondents.6.2 Lower interest rates was the most frequently listed positive factor identified by 49 percent of the respondents.
6.3 Other positive factors were: crop yields (18 percent) and land supply (14 percent).
6.4 There were 4 negative factors listed by over 10 percent of the respondents and they are all variations of low prices; low grain prices (49 percent), low livestock prices (29 percent), low commodity prices (27 percent) and low hog prices (10 percent).
7.0 Number of Sales Compared to Previous Year.
When asked to compare the number of sales in 1998 relative to 1997, 17 percent reported more, 50 percent the same, and 33 percent reported less.
8.0 Land Sales by Buyer Category.
The 1998 survey asked respondents what percent of the land sales were sold to four categories of buyers.
8.1 The majority of farmland sales; 64 percent were to existing farmers. Investors represented 30 percent of the sales. New farmers represented 4 percent of the sales and, other purchases were 2 percent of sales.8.2 Sales to existing farmers by Crop Reporting District ranged from 75 percent in West Central to 44 percent in Southwest.
8.3 Sales to investors were highest in Southwest (52 percent). North Central, West Central and East Central, reported the lowest investor activity (22 percent).
9.0 Interpretation of Survey Results.
The average 1.9 percent drop in land values is in line with other surveys of Iowa land values. It is important to remember the different time periods covered when comparing surveys. The Iowa State University survey reported here is an annual survey as of November 1, 1998.
9.1 This survey has shown the first decrease in Iowa land values after 11 years of increases. The 1998 average value is 16 percent below the peak in 1981 and 129 percent above the 1986 bottom.9.2 The 1998 survey reflects very closely what is happening around the state. The first part of the year saw land values continue to increase. However, the lower prices for all the major commodities caused the upward trend to stop and even reverse in most cases.
9.3 The drop in land values in 1998 has caused concern whether or not the land market will collapse as it did in the 1980s. There are some similarities and differences between now and then. Space does not permit going into all the various comparisons. The major descriptive word regarding the outlook for land prices is uncertainty. At this point in time we do not know how long the lower prices will last. How long the low prices last will determine the direction for the land market. The 1998 survey showed lower sales activity compared to 1997 and an increase in investors relative to existing farmer purchases but existing farmers are still the primary purchasers of farm land. The expectations for returns will continue to be the major force in determining the direction of the land market. Lower interest rates, happenings in the stock market and other events will have influence but expected returns will drive the market.
Table 1. Recent Changes in Iowa Farmland Values
|
Year |
Value per acre |
Dollar change |
Percent change |
|
1966 |
354 |
36 |
11.4 |
|
1967 |
397 |
42 |
12.0 |
|
1968 |
409 |
12 |
3.0 |
|
1969 |
419 |
10 |
2.5 |
|
1970 |
419 |
0 |
0.0 |
|
1971 |
430 |
11 |
2.6 |
|
1972 |
482 |
52 |
12.0 |
|
1973 |
635 |
154 |
31.9 |
|
1974 |
834 |
199 |
31.3 |
|
1975 |
1095 |
261 |
31.3 |
|
1976 |
1368 |
273 |
24.9 |
|
1977 |
1450 |
82 |
6.0 |
|
1978 |
1646 |
196 |
13.5 |
|
1979 |
1958 |
312 |
19.0 |
|
1980 |
2066 |
108 |
5.5 |
|
1981 |
2147 |
82 |
3.9 |
|
1982 |
1801 |
-346 |
-16.1 |
|
1983 |
1691 |
-110 |
- 6.1 |
|
1984 |
1357 |
-334 |
-19.8 |
|
1985 |
948 |
-409 |
-30.2 |
|
1986 |
787 |
-161 |
-17.0 |
|
1987 |
875 |
88 |
11.2 |
|
1988 |
1054 |
179 |
20.4 |
|
1989 |
1139 |
85 |
8.1 |
|
1990 |
1214 |
75 |
6.6 |
|
1991 |
1219 |
5 |
.4 |
|
1992 |
1249 |
30 |
2.5 |
|
1993 |
1275 |
26 |
2.1 |
|
1994 |
1356 |
81 |
6.4 |
|
1995 |
1455 |
99 |
7.3 |
|
1996 |
1682 |
227 |
15.6 |
|
1997 |
1837 |
155 |
9.2 |
|
1998 |
1801 |
-36 |
-1.9 |
|
State |
Northwest |
North |
Northeast |
West |
Central |
East |
Southwest |
South |
Southeast |
|
|
Year |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
1980 |
2066 |
2560 |
2624 |
2066 |
2038 |
2490 |
2323 |
1599 |
1079 |
1670 |
|
1986 |
787 |
937 |
912 |
786 |
768 |
930 |
1000 |
607 |
403 |
705 |
|
1987 |
875 |
1084 |
1055 |
835 |
871 |
1044 |
1053 |
676 |
421 |
782 |
|
1990 |
1214 |
1590 |
1447 |
1183 |
1263 |
1479 |
1339 |
870 |
588 |
1058 |
|
1991 |
1219 |
1576 |
1437 |
1144 |
1279 |
1476 |
1373 |
891 |
596 |
1093 |
|
1992 |
1249 |
1603 |
1449 |
1162 |
1324 |
1508 |
1395 |
905 |
646 |
1138 |
|
1993 |
1275 |
1618 |
1507 |
1176 |
1326 |
1542 |
1433 |
961 |
643 |
1166 |
|
1994 |
1356 |
1663 |
1610 |
1249 |
1453 |
1653 |
1546 |
1009 |
673 |
1241 |
|
1995 |
1455 |
1755 |
1724 |
1330 |
1528 |
1766 |
1676 |
1102 |
742 |
1367 |
|
1996 |
1682 |
2071 |
1997 |
1559 |
1758 |
2090 |
1965 |
1206 |
851 |
1502 |
|
1997 |
1837 |
2263 |
2194 |
1721 |
1894 |
2295 |
2110 |
1369 |
957 |
1580 |
|
1998 |
1801 |
2174 |
2119 |
1757 |
1820 |
2192 |
2123 |
1373 |
948 |
1585 |
|
|
||||||||||
|
1980 |
2646 |
3037 |
3053 |
2682 |
2545 |
3044 |
2986 |
2095 |
1721 |
2522 |
|
1986 |
1048 |
1131 |
1094 |
1048 |
1000 |
1154 |
1343 |
832 |
682 |
1120 |
|
1987 |
1150 |
1306 |
1260 |
1102 |
1125 |
1288 |
1399 |
912 |
688 |
1229 |
|
1990 |
1581 |
1907 |
1705 |
1595 |
1619 |
1816 |
1744 |
1175 |
935 |
1622 |
|
1991 |
1589 |
1898 |
1676 |
1522 |
1647 |
1812 |
1784 |
1198 |
949 |
1709 |
|
1992 |
1628 |
1920 |
1696 |
1557 |
1702 |
1846 |
1800 |
1212 |
1039 |
1764 |
|
1993 |
1666 |
1941 |
1764 |
1558 |
1707 |
1914 |
1851 |
1284 |
1041 |
1834 |
|
1994 |
1760 |
1972 |
1871 |
1651 |
1859 |
2010 |
1995 |
1347 |
1092 |
1938 |
|
1995 |
1869 |
2058 |
1968 |
1729 |
1939 |
2159 |
2131 |
1483 |
1163 |
2091 |
|
1996 |
2151 |
2431 |
2300 |
2015 |
2210 |
2558 |
2518 |
1586 |
1316 |
2291 |
|
1997 |
2328 |
2647 |
2531 |
2210 |
2350 |
2790 |
2673 |
1786 |
1443 |
2383 |
|
1998 |
2284 |
2534 |
2449 |
2238 |
2268 |
2659 |
2683 |
1798 |
1455 |
2369 |
|
|
||||||||||
|
1980 |
1846 |
2227 |
2287 |
1876 |
1839 |
2194 |
2074 |
1482 |
1039 |
1489 |
|
1986 |
699 |
830 |
777 |
709 |
684 |
813 |
866 |
561 |
396 |
622 |
|
1987 |
780 |
957 |
903 |
754 |
776 |
928 |
925 |
630 |
413 |
696 |
|
1990 |
1085 |
1405 |
1257 |
1053 |
1120 |
1318 |
1199 |
797 |
578 |
946 |
|
1991 |
1089 |
1379 |
1266 |
1035 |
1136 |
1313 |
1229 |
820 |
581 |
952 |
|
1992 |
1113 |
1420 |
1275 |
1038 |
1175 |
1346 |
1238 |
835 |
622 |
975 |
|
1993 |
1135 |
1434 |
1317 |
1054 |
1174 |
1363 |
1268 |
888 |
618 |
1015 |
|
1994 |
1223 |
1511 |
1420 |
1127 |
1316 |
1478 |
1387 |
936 |
652 |
1085 |
|
1995 |
1322 |
1598 |
1558 |
1216 |
1394 |
1580 |
1510 |
1009 |
726 |
1210 |
|
1996 |
1514 |
1873 |
1769 |
1423 |
1585 |
1843 |
1752 |
1111 |
829 |
1321 |
|
1997 |
1668 |
2033 |
1945 |
1577 |
1742 |
2050 |
1910 |
1280 |
945 |
1404 |
|
1998 |
1638 |
1970 |
1885 |
1604 |
1670 |
1968 |
1930 |
1274 |
924 |
1414 |
|
|
||||||||||
|
1980 |
1126 |
1475 |
1490 |
1138 |
1123 |
1303 |
1273 |
965 |
579 |
725 |
|
1986 |
377 |
488 |
468 |
405 |
350 |
475 |
460 |
290 |
176 |
257 |
|
1987 |
432 |
571 |
553 |
444 |
419 |
535 |
495 |
341 |
207 |
289 |
|
1990 |
608 |
835 |
787 |
589 |
619 |
750 |
635 |
456 |
301 |
445 |
|
1991 |
623 |
828 |
801 |
588 |
632 |
763 |
691 |
479 |
321 |
449 |
|
1992 |
648 |
866 |
813 |
592 |
668 |
784 |
712 |
511 |
346 |
486 |
|
1993 |
656 |
856 |
834 |
626 |
669 |
781 |
742 |
531 |
342 |
478 |
|
1994 |
714 |
882 |
935 |
668 |
752 |
914 |
808 |
555 |
348 |
503 |
|
1996 |
936 |
1213 |
1207 |
878 |
981 |
1146 |
1073 |
688 |
479 |
674 |
|
1997 |
1042 |
1354 |
1337 |
992 |
1083 |
1279 |
1186 |
787 |
544 |
730 |
|
1998 |
1030 |
1299 |
1286 |
1059 |
1021 |
1258 |
1205 |
792 |
542 |
739 |
|
Crop Reporting District |
More |
Same |
Less |
|
|
|||
|
Northwest |
15 |
55 |
30 |
|
North Central |
17 |
43 |
40 |
|
Northeast |
18 |
52 |
30 |
|
West Central |
15 |
55 |
30 |
|
Central |
15 |
45 |
40 |
|
East Central |
15 |
48 |
37 |
|
Southwest |
16 |
51 |
33 |
|
South Central |
29 |
45 |
26 |
|
Southeast |
17 |
55 |
28 |
|
State |
17 |
50 |
33 |
|
Crop Reporting District |
Existing Farmers |
Investors |
New Farmers |
Other |
|
|
||||
|
Northwest |
56 |
41 |
1 |
2 |
|
North Central |
65 |
22 |
13 |
0 |
|
Northeast |
57 |
32 |
9 |
2 |
|
West Central |
75 |
22 |
2 |
1 |
|
Central |
74 |
23 |
1 |
2 |
|
East Central |
74 |
22 |
3 |
1 |
|
Southwest |
44 |
52 |
2 |
2 |
|
South Central |
55 |
39 |
4 |
2 |
|
Southeast |
67 |
23 |
5 |
5 |
|
State |
64 |
30 |
4 |
2 |
Return to 1998 Land Value Home Page