1998 IOWA LAND VALUE SURVEY: OVERVIEW

Prepared by Michael D. Duffy, agricultural extension economist, Jay Lillywhite, and Nick Mastrogiannopoulos, Iowa State University, December 1998.

1.0 History and Purpose of the Land Value Survey.

1.1 The survey was initiated in 1941 and is sponsored annually by the Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station, Iowa State University. Only the state average and the district averages are based directly on the ISU survey data. The county estimates are derived by using a procedure that combines the ISU survey results with data from the U.S. Census of Agriculture. The survey was conducted by Michael Duffy with assistance from Jay Lillywhite and Nick Mastrogiannopoulos.

1.2 The survey is intended to provide information on general land value trends, geographical land price relationships and factors influencing the Iowa land market.

1.3 The survey is based on reports by licensed real estate brokers and selected individuals considered to be knowledgeable of land market conditions. Approximately 1100 surveys are mailed each year. Normally 500-600 completed surveys are returned. The 1998 survey is based on 589 usable responses.

1.4 Participants in the survey are asked to estimate the value of high, medium and low grade land in their county. Comparative sales and other factors are taken into account by the respondents in making these value estimates.

2.0 Analysis by State.

2.1 The 1998 state average for all grades of land was estimated to be $1801 per acre.

2.2 The decrease in the state value was $36 per acre from 1997.

2.3 The percentage decrease was 1.9 percent from 1997.

3.0 Analysis by Crop Reporting District.

3.1 The highest land values were reported for Central Iowa, $2192 per acre.

3.2 The lowest land values were estimated for South Central Iowa, $948 per acre.

3.3 The greatest percentage increase was in Northeast Iowa, 2.1 percent.

3.4 The greatest percentage decrease was in Central Iowa, 4.5 percent.

4.0 Analysis by Counties.

4.1 The highest value was estimated for Scott county, $2859 per acre.

4.2 The lowest value was in Decatur county, $757 per acre.

4.3 The greatest dollar increase was $35 in Fayette county.

4.4 The greatest dollar decrease was $121 in Hamilton county.

4.5 The greatest percentage increases were in Allamakee and Clayton counties, 2.3 percent.

4.6 The greatest percentage decrease was in Boone County, 4.7 percent.

5.0 Analysis by Quality of Land.

5.1 Low grade land in the state averaged $1030 per acre and showed an 1.1 percent decrease or $12 per acre.

5.2 Medium grade land averaged $1638 per acre and showed a 1.8 percent decrease or $30 per acre.

5.3 High grade land averaged $2284 per acre and showed a decrease of 1.9 percent or $44 per acre.

6.0 Major Factors Influencing the Real Estate Market.

Survey respondents listed both positive and negative factors influencing the land market. The respondents listed multiple factors in most cases.

6.1 There were 3 positive factors listed by over 10 percent of the respondents.

6.2 Lower interest rates was the most frequently listed positive factor identified by 49 percent of the respondents.

6.3 Other positive factors were: crop yields (18 percent) and land supply (14 percent).

6.4 There were 4 negative factors listed by over 10 percent of the respondents and they are all variations of low prices; low grain prices (49 percent), low livestock prices (29 percent), low commodity prices (27 percent) and low hog prices (10 percent).

7.0 Number of Sales Compared to Previous Year.

When asked to compare the number of sales in 1998 relative to 1997, 17 percent reported more, 50 percent the same, and 33 percent reported less.

8.0 Land Sales by Buyer Category.

The 1998 survey asked respondents what percent of the land sales were sold to four categories of buyers.

8.1 The majority of farmland sales; 64 percent were to existing farmers. Investors represented 30 percent of the sales. New farmers represented 4 percent of the sales and, other purchases were 2 percent of sales.

8.2 Sales to existing farmers by Crop Reporting District ranged from 75 percent in West Central to 44 percent in Southwest.

8.3 Sales to investors were highest in Southwest (52 percent). North Central, West Central and East Central, reported the lowest investor activity (22 percent).

9.0 Interpretation of Survey Results.

The average 1.9 percent drop in land values is in line with other surveys of Iowa land values. It is important to remember the different time periods covered when comparing surveys. The Iowa State University survey reported here is an annual survey as of November 1, 1998.

9.1 This survey has shown the first decrease in Iowa land values after 11 years of increases. The 1998 average value is 16 percent below the peak in 1981 and 129 percent above the 1986 bottom.

9.2 The 1998 survey reflects very closely what is happening around the state. The first part of the year saw land values continue to increase. However, the lower prices for all the major commodities caused the upward trend to stop and even reverse in most cases.

9.3 The drop in land values in 1998 has caused concern whether or not the land market will collapse as it did in the 1980s. There are some similarities and differences between now and then. Space does not permit going into all the various comparisons. The major descriptive word regarding the outlook for land prices is uncertainty. At this point in time we do not know how long the lower prices will last. How long the low prices last will determine the direction for the land market. The 1998 survey showed lower sales activity compared to 1997 and an increase in investors relative to existing farmer purchases but existing farmers are still the primary purchasers of farm land. The expectations for returns will continue to be the major force in determining the direction of the land market. Lower interest rates, happenings in the stock market and other events will have influence but expected returns will drive the market.

Table 1. Recent Changes in Iowa Farmland Values

Year

Value per acre

Dollar change

Percent change

1966

354

36

11.4

1967

397

42

12.0

1968

409

12

3.0

1969

419

10

2.5

1970

419

0

0.0

1971

430

11

2.6

1972

482

52

12.0

1973

635

154

31.9

1974

834

199

31.3

1975

1095

261

31.3

1976

1368

273

24.9

1977

1450

82

6.0

1978

1646

196

13.5

1979

1958

312

19.0

1980

2066

108

5.5

1981

2147

82

3.9

1982

1801

-346

-16.1

1983

1691

-110

- 6.1

1984

1357

-334

-19.8

1985

948

-409

-30.2

1986

787

-161

-17.0

1987

875

88

11.2

1988

1054

179

20.4

1989

1139

85

8.1

1990

1214

75

6.6

1991

1219

5

.4

1992

1249

30

2.5

1993

1275

26

2.1

1994

1356

81

6.4

1995

1455

99

7.3

1996

1682

227

15.6

1997

1837

155

9.2

1998

1801

-36

-1.9

Table 2. Average Value Per Acre of Iowa Farmland Listed by Crop Reporting Districts and Grades of Land

State
Average

Northwest

North
Central

Northeast

West
Central

Central

East
Central

Southwest

South
Central

Southeast

Year

All Grades

1980

2066

2560

2624

2066

2038

2490

2323

1599

1079

1670

1986

787

937

912

786

768

930

1000

607

403

705

1987

875

1084

1055

835

871

1044

1053

676

421

782

1990

1214

1590

1447

1183

1263

1479

1339

870

588

1058

1991

1219

1576

1437

1144

1279

1476

1373

891

596

1093

1992

1249

1603

1449

1162

1324

1508

1395

905

646

1138

1993

1275

1618

1507

1176

1326

1542

1433

961

643

1166

1994

1356

1663

1610

1249

1453

1653

1546

1009

673

1241

1995

1455

1755

1724

1330

1528

1766

1676

1102

742

1367

1996

1682

2071

1997

1559

1758

2090

1965

1206

851

1502

1997

1837

2263

2194

1721

1894

2295

2110

1369

957

1580

1998

1801

2174

2119

1757

1820

2192

2123

1373

948

1585

High Grade

1980

2646

3037

3053

2682

2545

3044

2986

2095

1721

2522

1986

1048

1131

1094

1048

1000

1154

1343

832

682

1120

1987

1150

1306

1260

1102

1125

1288

1399

912

688

1229

1990

1581

1907

1705

1595

1619

1816

1744

1175

935

1622

1991

1589

1898

1676

1522

1647

1812

1784

1198

949

1709

1992

1628

1920

1696

1557

1702

1846

1800

1212

1039

1764

1993

1666

1941

1764

1558

1707

1914

1851

1284

1041

1834

1994

1760

1972

1871

1651

1859

2010

1995

1347

1092

1938

1995

1869

2058

1968

1729

1939

2159

2131

1483

1163

2091

1996

2151

2431

2300

2015

2210

2558

2518

1586

1316

2291

1997

2328

2647

2531

2210

2350

2790

2673

1786

1443

2383

1998

2284

2534

2449

2238

2268

2659

2683

1798

1455

2369

Medium Grade

1980

1846

2227

2287

1876

1839

2194

2074

1482

1039

1489

1986

699

830

777

709

684

813

866

561

396

622

1987

780

957

903

754

776

928

925

630

413

696

1990

1085

1405

1257

1053

1120

1318

1199

797

578

946

1991

1089

1379

1266

1035

1136

1313

1229

820

581

952

1992

1113

1420

1275

1038

1175

1346

1238

835

622

975

1993

1135

1434

1317

1054

1174

1363

1268

888

618

1015

1994

1223

1511

1420

1127

1316

1478

1387

936

652

1085

1995

1322

1598

1558

1216

1394

1580

1510

1009

726

1210

1996

1514

1873

1769

1423

1585

1843

1752

1111

829

1321

1997

1668

2033

1945

1577

1742

2050

1910

1280

945

1404

1998

1638

1970

1885

1604

1670

1968

1930

1274

924

1414

Low Grade

1980

1126

1475

1490

1138

1123

1303

1273

965

579

725

1986

377

488

468

405

350

475

460

290

176

257

1987

432

571

553

444

419

535

495

341

207

289

1990

608

835

787

589

619

750

635

456

301

445

1991

623

828

801

588

632

763

691

479

321

449

1992

648

866

813

592

668

784

712

511

346

486

1993

656

856

834

626

669

781

742

531

342

478

1994

714

882

935

668

752

914

808

555

348

503

1996

936

1213

1207

878

981

1146

1073

688

479

674

1997

1042

1354

1337

992

1083

1279

1186

787

544

730

1998

1030

1299

1286

1059

1021

1258

1205

792

542

739

Level of Sales Activity, 1998

Crop Reporting District

More

Same

Less

Percentage

Northwest

15

55

30

North Central

17

43

40

Northeast

18

52

30

West Central

15

55

30

Central

15

45

40

East Central

15

48

37

Southwest

16

51

33

South Central

29

45

26

Southeast

17

55

28

State

17

50

33

Iowa Land Purchases, 1998

Crop Reporting District

Existing Farmers

Investors

New Farmers

Other

Percentage

Northwest

56

41

1

2

North Central

65

22

13

0

Northeast

57

32

9

2

West Central

75

22

2

1

Central

74

23

1

2

East Central

74

22

3

1

Southwest

44

52

2

2

South Central

55

39

4

2

Southeast

67

23

5

5

State

64

30

4

2

Return to 1998 Land Value Home Page