
1999 IOWA LAND VALUE SURVEY: OVERVIEW
Prepared by Michael D. Duffy, agricultural extension economist, Jay Lillywhite, research associate, and Matt Ernst, research assistant, Iowa State University, December 1999.
1.0 History and Purpose of the Land Value Survey.
1.1 The survey was initiated in 1941 and is sponsored annually by the Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station, Iowa State University. Only the state average and the district averages are based directly on the ISU survey data. The county estimates are derived by using a procedure that combines the ISU survey results with data from the U.S. Census of Agriculture. The survey was conducted by Michael Duffy with assistance from Jay Lillywhite and Matt Ernst.1.2 The survey is intended to provide information on general land value trends, geographical land price relationships and factors influencing the Iowa land market.
1.3 The survey is based on reports by licensed real estate brokers and selected individuals considered to be knowledgeable of land market conditions. Approximately 1100 surveys are mailed each year. Normally 500-600 completed surveys are returned. The 1999 survey is based on 631 usable responses.
1.4 Participants in the survey are asked to estimate the value of high, medium and low grade land in their county. Comparative sales and other factors are taken into account by the respondents in making these value estimates.
2.0 Analysis by State.
2.1 The 1999 state average for all grades of land was estimated to be $1781 per acre.2.2 The decrease in the state value was $20 per acre from 1998.
2.3 The percentage decrease was 1.1 percent from 1998.
3.0 Analysis by Crop Reporting District.
3.1 The highest land values were reported for Central Iowa, $2128 per acre.3.2 The lowest land values were estimated for South Central Iowa, $981 per acre.
3.3 The greatest percentage increase was in South Central Iowa, 3.5 percent.
3.4 The greatest percentage decrease was in Northwest Iowa, 5.3 percent.
4.0 Analysis by Counties.
4.1 The highest value was estimated for Scott county, $2970 per acre.4.2 The lowest value was in Decatur county, $752 per acre.
4.3 The greatest dollar increase was $137 in Clayton county.
4.4 The greatest dollar decrease was $135 in Hardin county.
4.5 The greatest percentage increase was in Clayton county, 9.2 percent.
4.6 The greatest percentage decrease was in Hardin county, 5.9 percent.
5.0 Analysis by Quality of Land.
5.1 Low grade land in the state averaged $1045 per acre and showed a 1.4 percent increase or $15 per acre.5.2 Medium grade land averaged $1629 per acre and showed a .5 percent decrease or $9 per acre.
5.3 High grade land averaged $2249 per acre and showed a decrease of 1.6 percent or $35 per acre.
6.0 Major Factors Influencing the Real Estate Market.
Survey respondents listed both positive and negative factors influencing the land market. The respondents listed multiple factors in most cases.
6.1 There were 5 positive factors listed by over 10 percent of the respondents.6.2 Government payments were the most frequently listed positive factor identified by 26 percent of the respondents.
6.3 Other positive factors were: interest rates (23 percent), crop yields (21 percent), land supply (17 percent), and investment demand (17 percent).
6.4 There were 4 negative factors listed by over 10 percent of the respondents and they are all variations of low prices: low grain prices (42 percent), low commodity prices (39 percent), low livestock prices (20 percent), and overall poor ag economy and outlook (12 percent).
7.0 Number of Sales Compared to Previous Year.
When asked to compare the number of sales in 1999 relative to 1998, 13 percent reported more, 43 percent the same, and 44 percent reported less.
8.0 Land Sales by Buyer Category.
The 1999 survey asked respondents what percent of the land sales were sold to four categories of buyers.
8.1 The majority of farmland sales: 64 percent were to existing farmers. Investors represented 30 percent of the sales. New farmers represented 2 percent of the sales and, other purchases were 4 percent of sales.8.2 Sales to existing farmers by Crop Reporting Districts ranged from 81 percent in North Central to 29 percent in South Central.
8.3 Sales to investors were highest in South Central (60 percent). North Central reported the lowest investor activity (15 percent).
9.0 Interpretation of Survey Results.
The average 1.1 percent drop in land values is in line with other surveys of Iowa land values. It is important to remember the different time periods covered when comparing surveys. The Iowa State University survey reported here is an annual survey as of November 1, 1999.
9.1 This survey showed the continuation of the conditions in Iowa land values first noted last year, namely, there are some counties and Crop Reporting Districts with increased values while others show decreasing values. The 1999 survey showed a drop in average land values for the second straight year. The 1999 drop of 1.1 percent is slightly less than the average drop of 1.9 percent reported last year.9.2 The 1999 survey shows an interesting pattern of changes in land values. Values were lower in the Northwest, North Central, Central and East Central parts of the state. These areas are generally considered to have the best soils in the state. Counties in the South Central and Northeast showed an increase in value. Also, Iowa has 19 counties that border on a major river. Slightly over two-thirds of these counties showed an increase in value.
9.3 Strong farm income, comprised mainly of government payments held land values in Iowa in 1999. In addition, investor interest played a supporting role in many areas of the state. The 1999 survey showed a decreasing amount of sales activity around
Table 1. Recent Changes in Iowa Farmland Values
|
Year |
Value per acre |
Dollar change |
Percent change |
|
1966 |
354 |
36 |
11.4 |
|
1967 |
397 |
42 |
12.0 |
|
1968 |
409 |
12 |
3.0 |
|
1969 |
419 |
10 |
2.5 |
|
1970 |
419 |
0 |
0.0 |
|
1971 |
430 |
11 |
2.6 |
|
1972 |
482 |
52 |
12.0 |
|
1973 |
635 |
154 |
31.9 |
|
1974 |
834 |
199 |
31.3 |
|
1975 |
1095 |
261 |
31.3 |
|
1976 |
1368 |
273 |
24.9 |
|
1977 |
1450 |
82 |
6.0 |
|
1978 |
1646 |
196 |
13.5 |
|
1979 |
1958 |
312 |
19.0 |
|
1980 |
2066 |
108 |
5.5 |
|
1981 |
2147 |
82 |
3.9 |
|
1982 |
1801 |
-346 |
-16.1 |
|
1983 |
1691 |
-110 |
- 6.1 |
|
1984 |
1357 |
-334 |
-19.8 |
|
1985 |
948 |
-409 |
-30.2 |
|
1986 |
787 |
-161 |
-17.0 |
|
1987 |
875 |
88 |
11.2 |
|
1988 |
1054 |
179 |
20.4 |
|
1989 |
1139 |
85 |
8.1 |
|
1990 |
1214 |
75 |
6.6 |
|
1991 |
1219 |
5 |
.4 |
|
1992 |
1249 |
30 |
2.5 |
|
1993 |
1275 |
26 |
2.1 |
|
1994 |
1356 |
81 |
6.4 |
|
1995 |
1455 |
99 |
7.3 |
|
1996 |
1682 |
227 |
15.6 |
|
1997 |
1837 |
155 |
9.2 |
|
1998 |
1801 |
-36 |
-1.9 |
|
1999 |
1781 |
-20 |
-1.1 |
|
State |
Northwest |
North |
Northeast |
West |
Central |
East |
Southwest |
South |
Southeast |
|
|
Year |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
1980 |
2066 |
2560 |
2624 |
2066 |
2038 |
2490 |
2323 |
1599 |
1079 |
1670 |
|
1986 |
787 |
937 |
912 |
786 |
768 |
930 |
1000 |
607 |
403 |
705 |
|
1987 |
875 |
1084 |
1055 |
835 |
871 |
1044 |
1053 |
676 |
421 |
782 |
|
1990 |
1214 |
1590 |
1447 |
1183 |
1263 |
1479 |
1339 |
870 |
588 |
1058 |
|
1991 |
1219 |
1576 |
1437 |
1144 |
1279 |
1476 |
1373 |
891 |
596 |
1093 |
|
1992 |
1249 |
1603 |
1449 |
1162 |
1324 |
1508 |
1395 |
905 |
646 |
1138 |
|
1993 |
1275 |
1618 |
1507 |
1176 |
1326 |
1542 |
1433 |
961 |
643 |
1166 |
|
1994 |
1356 |
1663 |
1610 |
1249 |
1453 |
1653 |
1546 |
1009 |
673 |
1241 |
|
1995 |
1455 |
1755 |
1724 |
1330 |
1528 |
1766 |
1676 |
1102 |
742 |
1367 |
|
1996 |
1682 |
2071 |
1997 |
1559 |
1758 |
2090 |
1965 |
1206 |
851 |
1502 |
|
1997 |
1837 |
2263 |
2194 |
1721 |
1894 |
2295 |
2110 |
1369 |
957 |
1580 |
|
1998 |
1801 |
2174 |
2119 |
1757 |
1820 |
2192 |
2123 |
1373 |
948 |
1585 |
|
1999 |
1781 |
2059 |
2073 |
1807 |
1837 |
2128 |
2118 |
1346 |
981 |
1570 |
|
|
||||||||||
|
1980 |
2646 |
3037 |
3053 |
2682 |
2545 |
3044 |
2986 |
2095 |
1721 |
2522 |
|
1986 |
1048 |
1131 |
1094 |
1048 |
1000 |
1154 |
1343 |
832 |
682 |
1120 |
|
1987 |
1150 |
1306 |
1260 |
1102 |
1125 |
1288 |
1399 |
912 |
688 |
1229 |
|
1990 |
1581 |
1907 |
1705 |
1595 |
1619 |
1816 |
1744 |
1175 |
935 |
1622 |
|
1991 |
1589 |
1898 |
1676 |
1522 |
1647 |
1812 |
1784 |
1198 |
949 |
1709 |
|
1992 |
1628 |
1920 |
1696 |
1557 |
1702 |
1846 |
1800 |
1212 |
1039 |
1764 |
|
1993 |
1666 |
1941 |
1764 |
1558 |
1707 |
1914 |
1851 |
1284 |
1041 |
1834 |
|
1994 |
1760 |
1972 |
1871 |
1651 |
1859 |
2010 |
1995 |
1347 |
1092 |
1938 |
|
1995 |
1869 |
2058 |
1968 |
1729 |
1939 |
2159 |
2131 |
1483 |
1163 |
2091 |
|
1996 |
2151 |
2431 |
2300 |
2015 |
2210 |
2558 |
2518 |
1586 |
1316 |
2291 |
|
1997 |
2328 |
2647 |
2531 |
2210 |
2350 |
2790 |
2673 |
1786 |
1443 |
2383 |
|
1998 |
2284 |
2534 |
2449 |
2238 |
2268 |
2659 |
2683 |
1798 |
1455 |
2369 |
|
1999 |
2249 |
2401 |
2362 |
2275 |
2288 |
2589 |
2685 |
1773 |
1499 |
2271 |
|
|
||||||||||
|
1980 |
1846 |
2227 |
2287 |
1876 |
1839 |
2194 |
2074 |
1482 |
1039 |
1489 |
|
1986 |
699 |
830 |
777 |
709 |
684 |
813 |
866 |
561 |
396 |
622 |
|
1987 |
780 |
957 |
903 |
754 |
776 |
928 |
925 |
630 |
413 |
696 |
|
1990 |
1085 |
1405 |
1257 |
1053 |
1120 |
1318 |
1199 |
797 |
578 |
946 |
|
1991 |
1089 |
1379 |
1266 |
1035 |
1136 |
1313 |
1229 |
820 |
581 |
952 |
|
1992 |
1113 |
1420 |
1275 |
1038 |
1175 |
1346 |
1238 |
835 |
622 |
975 |
|
1993 |
1135 |
1434 |
1317 |
1054 |
1174 |
1363 |
1268 |
888 |
618 |
1015 |
|
1994 |
1223 |
1511 |
1420 |
1127 |
1316 |
1478 |
1387 |
936 |
652 |
1085 |
|
1995 |
1322 |
1598 |
1558 |
1216 |
1394 |
1580 |
1510 |
1009 |
726 |
1210 |
|
1996 |
1514 |
1873 |
1769 |
1423 |
1585 |
1843 |
1752 |
1111 |
829 |
1321 |
|
1997 |
1668 |
2033 |
1945 |
1577 |
1742 |
2050 |
1910 |
1280 |
945 |
1404 |
|
1998 |
1638 |
1970 |
1885 |
1604 |
1670 |
1968 |
1930 |
1274 |
924 |
1414 |
|
1999 |
1629 |
1876 |
1869 |
1665 |
1692 |
1898 |
1945 |
1241 |
949 |
1433 |
|
|
||||||||||
|
1980 |
1126 |
1475 |
1490 |
1138 |
1123 |
1303 |
1273 |
965 |
579 |
725 |
|
1986 |
377 |
488 |
468 |
405 |
350 |
475 |
460 |
290 |
176 |
257 |
|
1987 |
432 |
571 |
553 |
444 |
419 |
535 |
495 |
341 |
207 |
289 |
|
1990 |
608 |
835 |
787 |
589 |
619 |
750 |
635 |
456 |
301 |
445 |
|
1991 |
623 |
828 |
801 |
588 |
632 |
763 |
691 |
479 |
321 |
449 |
|
1992 |
648 |
866 |
813 |
592 |
668 |
784 |
712 |
511 |
346 |
486 |
|
1993 |
656 |
856 |
834 |
626 |
669 |
781 |
742 |
531 |
342 |
478 |
|
1994 |
714 |
882 |
935 |
668 |
752 |
914 |
808 |
555 |
348 |
503 |
|
1996 |
936 |
1213 |
1207 |
878 |
981 |
1146 |
1073 |
688 |
479 |
674 |
|
1997 |
1042 |
1354 |
1337 |
992 |
1083 |
1279 |
1186 |
787 |
544 |
730 |
|
1998 |
1030 |
1299 |
1286 |
1059 |
1021 |
1258 |
1205 |
792 |
542 |
739 |
|
1999 |
1045 |
1216 |
1314 |
1110 |
1040 |
1296 |
1188 |
798 |
582 |
790 |
|
Crop Reporting District |
More |
Same |
Less |
|
|
|||
|
Northwest |
12 |
49 |
39 |
|
North Central |
6 |
33 |
61 |
|
Northeast |
11 |
43 |
46 |
|
West Central |
16 |
57 |
27 |
|
Central |
15 |
35 |
50 |
|
East Central |
18 |
38 |
44 |
|
Southwest |
8 |
38 |
54 |
|
South Central |
16 |
54 |
30 |
|
Southeast |
16 |
44 |
40 |
|
State |
13 |
43 |
44 |
|
Crop Reporting District |
Existing Farmers |
Investors |
New Farmers |
Other |
|
|
||||
|
Northwest |
71 |
27 |
1 |
1 |
|
North Central |
81 |
14 |
3 |
2 |
|
Northeast |
65 |
29 |
3 |
3 |
|
West Central |
57 |
39 |
1 |
3 |
|
Central |
69 |
27 |
1 |
3 |
|
East Central |
68 |
29 |
1 |
2 |
|
Southwest |
64 |
31 |
2 |
3 |
|
South Central |
29 |
60 |
4 |
7 |
|
Southeast |
72 |
17 |
3 |
8 |
|
State |
64 |
30 |
2 |
4 |
Return to 1999 Land Value Home Page