Odor and Nutrient Management Newsletter

Summer 1998

Incorporate manure to reduce odor and maintain residue cover

by Mark Hanna, extension agricultural and biosystems engineer

Livestock producers who prefer incorporating manure often must balance their decisions with destroying residue cover, slowing field application, and using more tractor horsepower. While the benefit is reduced odor and limited nutrient losses, the decision is often a difficult one.

Iowa State University ag engineers have been conducting field experiments in both no-till soybean and corn residue to evaluate the effects of six liquid swine manure application methods on odor and residue cover retention.

The researchers recommend avoiding broadcast application if odor is the primary concern. Most methods involving some soil incorporation reduce odor levels to a fraction of the broadcast level. Odor levels decline over time and become indistinguishable from the odor of untreated soil.

The treatments in the field experiments include four commercial methods: injection with a two-inch-wide knife, injection with a 16-inch-wide sweep, surface broadcast application, and broadcast application with disk incorporation.

One alternate method, row cleaner, applies manure under surface residue and on the soil surface. This is accomplished by moving residue from a narrow strip with a row cleaner, applying manure in a narrow surface band, and then returning residue over the band with closing wheels. A second alternate method, narrow knife, injects manure in a shallow band behind a narrow-profile knife designed to minimize soil disturbance. The row cleaner and all injection treatments use finger-closing wheels.

Each treatment is tested both in the fall and in the spring. In addition to measuring residue cover, air samples over the soil surface are obtained both during application and one day later for evaluation by an odor panel.

Results thus far indicate that incorporation techniques typically reduce odor level by 20 percent to 90 percent, compared to broadcast application. One day after application, odor is greatly reduced and often indistinguishable from that of untreated soil.

The choice of a manure application method in soybean residue is more critical to maintaining cover than the choice of a method in corn residue.

Photo spreaderIn soybean residue, the narrow knife and row cleaner methods have shown better retention of residue cover than other incorporation treatments. The odor they emit is comparable to commercial incorporation treatments. Among the commercial incorporation techniques of knife, sweep, and disk incorporation, the knife leaves more residue cover, with very little increase in odor compared to the incorporation with sweep or tandem disk.

In corn residue, the sweep treatment leaves less cover than other incorporation treatments immediately after application. After planting, residue cover in the row cleaner and conventional knife treatments has been greater than other incorporation treatments. The tandem disk, knife, and sweep methods produce less odor than broadcast application.

Residue coverage and odor emission from the two alternative treatments do not seem to differ as much from other incorporation treatments in corn residue. Broadcast application has maintained the greatest residue cover in both crops, but has the highest odor levels. Although greater residue cover has been maintained with fall-applied treatments, cover is reduced by this application strategy during the winter and early spring.

return to Odor and Nutrient Management Home Page
This newsletter provides information on manure management, events, regulatory updates, and access to resources

Iowa State University ExtensionAmes, Iowa 50011

Copyright © 1997-2004, Iowa State University. All rights reserved.
Non-Discrimination Statement and Information Disclosures

|Search all contents|

|Odor and Nutrient Management Home Page| |Iowa State University Extension|
|Feedback/Comments to Angela Rieck-Hinz| |Comments on web site|

Page last updated October 5, 2004

Iowa Manure Matters: Odor and Nutrient Management is published by Iowa State University Extension, with funding support from the USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service through Cooperative Agreement No. 74-6114-8-22. To subscribe or change the address of a current subscription, write to Angela Rieck-Hinz, 2104 Agronomy Hall, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, 50011-1010 or call 515-294-9590, fax 515-294-9985 or email: amrieck@iastate.edu. Please indicate you are inquiring about the Odor and Nutrient Management Newsletter. The newsletter's coordinators are Angela Rieck-Hinz, extension program specialist, Department of Agronomy, Wendy Powers, environmental extension specialist, Department of Animal Science, and Robert Burns, Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering; the editor is Jean McGuire, the subscription manager is Rachel Klein, the production designer is Beth Kroeschell, and the web page designer is Liisa Jarvinen.

... and justice for all.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Many materials can be made available in alternative formats for ADA clients. To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call 202-720-5964.