Spring 2000

Manure planning pays for small farms

by Chad Ingels, Maquoketa Watershed Project, Fayette, Iowa

Public awareness of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) and how they affect water quality continues to increase, especially with the growing number of large livestock operations. However, a significant number of livestock farms are still considered small animal feeding operations (SAFOs) by the Iowa Legislature, and these operations are not subject to writing manure management plans and the resulting regulations. Information from the Iowa Statistics Service shows that in 1998, the average dairy farm in Fayette County and Clayton County had 67 and 58 cows, respectively. The smaller farms are not required to produce detailed manure management plans. Each year, a 75-cow milking herd and replacements produce approximately 2,500 tons of manure containing 30,000 pounds of N and 15,000 pounds of P. As producers of a nutrient rich by-product, small livestock operations need to manage on-farm nutrients in an environmentally and economically sound manner.

With spreader calibration and a nutrient management plan, an economic analysis can be established for manure produced on an average 75-cow dairy herd in northeastern Iowa. A typical dairy herd produces 32.77 tons of solid manure/milk cow/year (See ISU Extension publication Pm 1811, Managing manure nutrients for crop production.) The 75 cows and replacements create 2,458 tons of manure per year. For this example, assume that manure (85 percent) is collected and surface-applied on the available cropland. The 2,089 tons of manure to be spread has an analysis of 12-6-12 (N-P-K [potassium]), and 70 percent of the N will be available to the crop after in-field volatilization (See Pm 1811). If 50 percent of the N will be available to the crop the first year, there will be 8,774 pounds of N; 12,534 pounds of P; and 25,068 pounds of K credited for crop use if soils are testing in the optimum range or lower.

The farm in this example will produce 150 bushels of corn and 50 bushels of beans per acre in a corn–bean rotation. There are 130 acres of corn per year following soybeans. A credit of 50 pounds N/acre is used in the crop rotation. To supply the rest of his or her N needs, the farmer typically applies N as anhydrous ammonia (NH₃) and has the local cooperative spread a crop removal rate of potash and phosphate following beans. The total commercial N applied is 120 pounds/acre.

When developing a manure management plan, there are two different methods to determine the desired application rate. The first, and most widely used, method is to apply manure based on the desired N rate for the crop. The second method is to apply manure at the crop removal rate of P. This latter method may be required in the future for manure management planning. The economic benefit of each method can be compared in the table.

Planning for application at the N rate would require spreading manure on 73 acres (120 pounds N/acre) and commercial fertilizer on 57 acres each year. The costs associated with manure hauling are not included because it would be hauled to some fields anyway. Applying manure at 28.6 tons/acre would provide the nutrients for this scenario. (From Northeast Iowa Demonstration Project spreader calibrations, the average 280-bushel spreader applies 21.4 tons/acre.) A nutrient management plan with the N rate application of manure would save $4528.19 per year in input costs compared with the current plan where no manure credits are taken.

Using the P rate for manure application would require 130 acres each year. Fifty-five units of N/acre would need to be purchased under this plan; however, the P and K would not be overapplied and would maintain the soil test values. The use of the P rate plan would result in spreading manure at a rate of 16 tons/acre. Profit would be increased by $6,243.90/year when recognizing the manure credit at the P rate application. This is an increase of $1,715.71 above the savings with the N rate plan.

To feel comfortable with taking manure credits, it is essential to calibrate the spreader to achieve the desired application rate of nutrients. With proper calibration, it is easy to acknowledge the nutrient credits that are available and apply the cost savings directly to the farm’s bottom line.

For more information about this topic and the nutrient demonstrations in the Maquoketa River Watershed, call me at (319) 425-3233 or e-mail x1ingels@exnet.iastate.edu

Ames, Iowa 50011

Copyright © 1997-2004, Iowa State University. All rights reserved.
Non-Discrimination Statement and Information Disclosures

|Search all contents|

|Odor and Nutrient Management Home Page| |Iowa State University Extension|
|Feedback/Comments to Angela Rieck-Hinz| |Comments on web site|

Page last updated October 5, 2004

Credits:
Iowa Manure Matters: Odor and Nutrient Management is published by Iowa State University Extension, with funding support from the USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service through Cooperative Agreement No. 74-6114-8-22. To subscribe or change the address of a current subscription, write to Angela Rieck-Hinz, 2104 Agronomy Hall, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, 50011-1010 or call 515-294-9590, fax 515-294-9985 or email: amrieck@iastate.edu. Please indicate you are inquiring about the Odor and Nutrient Management Newsletter. The newsletter's coordinators are Angela Rieck-Hinz, extension program specialist, Department of Agronomy, Wendy Powers, environmental extension specialist, Department of Animal Science, and Robert Burns, Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering; the editor is Jean McGuire, the subscription manager is Rachel Klein, the production designer is Beth Kroeschell, and the web page designer is Liisa Jarvinen.