Odor and Nutrient Management Newsletter

Fall 2003

Manure Management: Successes and Challenges

by Mahdi Al-Kaisi and Mark Licht, Department of Agronomy, and Mark Hanna, Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering

As part of an integrated tillage and manure management demonstration project in NE Iowa, a survey evaluated the impact of improved management practices in tillage and manure management. The survey was conducted with participants in the project. Cooperators consider manure a valuable nutrient source for crop production; 57 percent of them believe that using manure alone can produce corn yields comparable to commercial nitrogen (N). All cooperators take manure samples for analysis every year, to determine manure application rates. This information is important because 71 percent of the cooperators self-apply manure: 86 percent of them applied manure based on N needs while only 14 percent based on phosphorus (P) needs.

Hubs and Spokes cooperators prepare to calibrate manure application equipment
Hubs and Spokes cooperators prepare to calibrate
manure application equipment.

From data obtained from on-farm trials, cooperators are finding that optimal yields can be achieved with manure use only and result in a reduction of commercial N-fertilizer use. Thirty percent of the cooperators have stopped applying commercial N-fertilizer on other (non-trial) manured fields and 14 percent have reduced supplemental commercial N by 50 lbs/acre. Cooperators are also realizing the consequences manure can have on the environment. The prevailing attitude among them was, “if you over-apply N and you do not see any yield response, this means the N is going somewhere.” Another attitude change was related to their understanding of manure as a nutrient source rather than a waste product. These changes in cooperator behavior and attitudes towards manure use and management are a very significant step in achieving integrated tillage and manure management.

When producers were asked about the importance of manure management, the consensus was “it helps us fine-tune our management practices” and “the project gives an opportunity to increase manure management knowledge.” Cooperators appreciate timely, site-specific information that enables them to fine-tune their individual practices. They also stress that on-farm application equipment. manure management trials are “actual results” and “it’s exactly what happens at our fields.” Cooperators also mentioned “the information is site specific and readily available to us.” Many of them indicated that it is an advantage to have replicated and repeatable data for making manure management decisions in on-farm trials.

Cooperators are enthusiastic about participating in on-farm manure management demonstrations. Seventy-one percent of them believe they learned or improved skills by working with the project and 79 percent indicated they are managing manure much more efficiently now.

However, cooperators have expressed concerns about tillage and manure management. Currently, they foresee the following challenges related to tillage and manure management: incorporating residue cover vs. manure, achieving accurate application rates with available technology, timing manure application and sample analysis, deciding on N vs. P based application rates, having cost-share funds available for manure application technology (i.e. flow controllers), dealing with the costs associated with hauling, applicators, technology, and sample analyses.

For more information regarding this demonstration project, please see the project summary reports for the Hubs and Spokes Demonstration project at this Web site.

The Hubs and Spokes Project, part of the Integrated Farm/Livestock Management (IFLM) Demonstration Project, receives funding from the Iowa Department of Agriculture and Land Stewardship, Division of Soil Conservation.

return to Odor and Nutrient Management Home Page
This newsletter provides information on manure management, events, regulatory updates, and access to resources


Iowa State University ExtensionAmes, Iowa 50011

Copyright © 1997-2004, Iowa State University. All rights reserved.
Non-Discrimination Statement and Information Disclosures

|Search all contents|

|Odor and Nutrient Management Home Page| |Iowa State University Extension|
|Feedback/Comments to Angela Rieck-Hinz| |Comments on web site|

Page last updated October 5, 2004

Credits:
Iowa Manure Matters: Odor and Nutrient Management is published by Iowa State University Extension, with funding support from the USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service through Cooperative Agreement No. 74-6114-8-22. To subscribe or change the address of a current subscription, write to Angela Rieck-Hinz, 2104 Agronomy Hall, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, 50011-1010 or call 515-294-9590, fax 515-294-9985 or email: amrieck@iastate.edu. Please indicate you are inquiring about the Odor and Nutrient Management Newsletter. The newsletter's coordinators are Angela Rieck-Hinz, extension program specialist, Department of Agronomy, Wendy Powers, environmental extension specialist, Department of Animal Science, and Robert Burns, Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering; the editor is Jean McGuire, the subscription manager is Rachel Klein, the production designer is Beth Kroeschell, and the web page designer is Liisa Jarvinen.

... and justice for all.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Many materials can be made available in alternative formats for ADA clients. To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call 202-720-5964.