
Fall
2001
Producers
learn value of manure sampling and use on crop acres
by
Greg Brenneman, Johnson County Extension; and Sherry Hoyer, Iowa
Pork Industry Center
A recent study designed
to educate Iowa producers on how to better use swine manure as a fertilizer
and to encourage them to test their manure for nutrient content before
applying it has produced some unexpected positive results. Study leaders
Greg Brenneman and Kris Kohl say these results should help producers realize
that manure sampling need not be difficult to be effective; a simple collection
procedure can be used without affecting the accuracy of the sampling.
The two Iowa State
University Extension agricultural engineers designed the study that was
funded by the Iowa Pork Industry Center. Manure sampling of deep pits
was conducted at 20 locations throughout Iowa, and five different samples
from each pit were compared. A profile sample and a surface sample were
taken prior to land application and three samples were collected while
the pit was being pumped. Profile samples were collected with a probe
and surface samples were collected with a bucket.
Samples were analyzed
at a commercial laboratory and the results were somewhat surprising. Not
only was there less variability within a pit than expected but also many
of the samples showed higher nutrient content values in the surface sample
than the profile sample. These data were combined with similar data from
a separate project in Sioux County and analyzed at the ISU Statistical
Lab to determine the best presampling technique for assessing nutrient
content of manure to be field-applied. The combined results show that,
when looking for nitrogen prediction, a sample collected from the pit
surface was superior to the probe (profile sample) of the pit. For P2O5,
the profile sample was better, although the difference was small.
Manure
testing is an important management tool for determining the correct rate
of manure application to fields for optimum crop yields, without causing
environmental damage. Because all manure studies show variation between
pits, producers get the best results by conducting their own testing.
The ideal time for collecting manure samples is during agitation and land
application, but average laboratory turnaround time is 10 to 14 days.
By the time the analysis reaches producers, the manure application is
complete and no rate adjustments are possible.
Because most producers
are applying swine manure based on its nitrogen content, and the surface
sample is a better predictor of nitrogen content, producers should plan
to use the surface sampling technique that requires only a plastic pail.
Although book values can be used to estimate nutrient content of deep
pit manure, doing the individual pit testing provides the most accurate
and timely levels.
A second part of the
study involved field trials with swine finishing manure as the sole source
of fertilizer for corn following soybean. In 1999 and 2000 at two different
locations, fall-injected swine finishing manure applied at approximately
4000 gallons per acre produced as high or higher yields than normal rates
of commercial fertilizer. Also, addition of more manure or nitrogen did
not result in additional yield.
Data from this study
help validate the reliability of manure testing and help make recommendations
regarding sampling prior to pumping out a pit. By knowing the amounts
of specific nutrients in the manure from their operation, producers gain
confidence in using swine manure for meeting their crop nutrient needs.
Results of this study
also should encourage more producers to accurately and easily test for
nutrient content and use the manure as a valuable fertilizer source for
their crop acres. Project findings are being summarized and will be included
in upcoming confinement site manure applicator certification programs
offered by ISU Extension.
For additional information
about manure sampling, see the article
Sampling and agitation of swine manure pits in the Fall
2000 issue of this newsletter.
|