Farmer Awareness of Herbicide-resistant Weeds

April 25, 2014
ICM News

By Mike Owen and Bob Hartzler, Department of Agronomy, and Brent Pringnitz,  ISU Extension and Outreach


One of the key concerns about managing pests, and specifically weeds, is time requirements. This reflects not only agricultural demographics such as farm size, but also whether individuals have off-farm job responsibilities. The distribution of farm sizes represented in the survey responses approached a normal distribution (Table 1) and is representative of the farm size distribution in Iowa based on recent information from the National Agricultural Statistics Service.


Table 1. Grower awareness of herbicide resistance in weeds and modifications in weed management programs based on a survey administered at the 2014 Crop Advantage Series.



When asked about whether they were aware of herbicide-resistant weeds on their farm, 70 percent indicated yes. This statistic is similar to information gathered in a project sponsored by the Iowa Soybean Association. The distribution of growers who responded positively about awareness of herbicide-resistant weeds was interesting in that the growers who farmed less than 250 acres were the least aware of this problem (Table 1). Similarly, they reported that they were less likely to change their management practices to address the evolution of herbicide-resistant weeds.


Farmers' willingness to modify weed management was generally directly related to their awareness of herbicide resistance; greater awareness of the problem resulted in adjustments to weed management. However, only 60 percent of the growers who farmed greater than 5,000 acres reported that they modified weed management programs despite a 70 percent awareness. This could mean that the larger growers had already modified the weed management programs or that they did not see the problem as a major threat.


The question that must be considered is how growers chose to modify their weed management programs. Comments by participating farmers indicated that the most common changes were inclusion of residual herbicides and use of multiple herbicide groups. Whether these adjustments address the complexity of the multiple herbicide resistances present in waterhemp remains to be seen. The fact that most of the changes are herbicide-based may not provide the necessary diversity of tactics needed to address the increasing issues of herbicide resistance in Iowa crop production.



 


Mike Owen is an Iowa State University professor of agronomy and weed science extension specialist with responsibilities in weed management and herbicide use. He can be reached at (515) 294-5936 or e-mail mdowen@iastate.edu. Bob Hartzler is an Iowa State University professor of agronomy and weed science extension specialist with responsibilities in weed management and herbicide use. He can be reached at hartzler@iastate.edu or 515-294-1923. Brent Pringnitz is a program services coordinator with ANR Extension. He can be reached at (515) 294-6429 or e-mailbpring@iastate.edu.


 

Category: 

Links to this article are strongly encouraged, and this article may be republished without further permission if published as written and if credit is given to the author, Integrated Crop Management News, and Iowa State University Extension and Outreach. If this article is to be used in any other manner, permission from the author is required. This article was originally published on April 25, 2014. The information contained within may not be the most current and accurate depending on when it is accessed.