Skip Navigation

1/7/2013 - 1/13/2013

Evaluation of Foliar Fungicides and Insecticides on Soybean in 2012

By Daren Mueller and Stith Wiggs, Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology

There are many fungicides and insecticides labeled for use in Iowa soybean. With partial funding from industry and soybean checkoff funds from the Iowa Soybean Association, we evaluated common foliar fungicides and insecticides at seven locations across Iowa in 2012 to determine yield response to an R3 (beginning pod set) application timing (Fig. 1).

Materials and Methods

 

The experimental design was a randomized complete block with four replications at each location. Details on variety and planting, application and harvest date are listed in Table 1. Treatments (Table 2) consisted of an untreated control, fungicides alone, insecticides alone, fungicides and insecticides in combination and pesticide application based on aphid scouting (IPM). In applicable treatments, fungicides and insecticides were applied at growth stage R3 (beginning pod) at all seven locations. Disease was assessed when soybeans were at the R6 growth stage (full seed set).  Soybean aphid populations were observed between R3 and R6, but soybean aphid populations did not reach threshold at any of the seven locations. Total seed weight and moisture was measured, seed weight was adjusted to 13 percent and yield was calculated.

 

Table 1. Cultivar, planting date, application date, harvest date for seven fungicide and insecticide trials in Iowa in 2012.

 

 

 

Farm

 

 

Cultivar

 

Planting

date

 

Application

 date

Disease

assessment

date*

 

Harvest

date

Armstrong

Pioneer 93M11

May 10

July 25

Aug. 21

Oct. 4

Curtiss

AG2431

May 11

July 24

Aug. 29

Sept. 22

McNay

Pioneer 93M11

May 10

July 30

Aug. 21

Sept. 26

Northeast

AG2431

May 12

July 27

Aug. 24

Sept. 29

Northern

Stine 19RA02

May 11

July 16

Aug. 22

Sept. 29

Northwest

Kruger 1901

May 11

July 25

Aug. 22

Sept. 27

Southeast

Pioneer 93Y22

May 18

July 26

Aug. 23

Oct. 29

 

 

*R6 growth stage

 

 

Results

Yield varied across locations ranging from 33.9 to 64.6 bu/ac in the untreated control (Table 2).  Differences were observed between pesticide treatments and the untreated control at the Ames and Armstrong locations (Table 2).

 

Foliar disease did not differ between fungicide and insecticide treatments and the untreated control at the Armstrong, Southeast, Northeast, Northwest and McNay locations. There were foliar disease differences between the fungicide treatments and the untreated control at the Curtiss and Northern location. The most predominate disease found was Septoria brown spot. Septoria brown spot did not move into the upper canopy before R6 at any of the seven locations, so it likely had minimal impact on yield. The average severity in the untreated control in the lower canopy was less than 3 percent. At some locations, fungicides reduced brown spot severity in the lower canopy, but again, disease probably had minimal impact on yield.

 

Soybean aphids did not reach the threshold at any location. IPM treatments became an additional untreated control.

 

Seed moisture ranged from 7.8 – 12.1 across locations, but did not differ more than a few tenths of a percentage amongst treatments within any location.

 

Table 2. Yield response for foliar fungicides and insecticides treatments in 2012.

 


a Applied with COC 1% v/v
b Applied with Non Ionic Surfactant (NIS) 0.25% v/v
d Soybean aphid threshold was never reached so the IPM treatment became an additional untreated control
e Least significant difference comparing all treatments
* Significantly different from untreated control
o Significantly different from insecticide alone equivalent
NS – not statistically significant

 

 

Summary

 

This is the first year we were able to evaluate fungicides under drier weather conditions. While individual products affected yields at certain locations, in general, all products had minimal significant effects on yield. There were very few diseases (and insects) at all seven locations, so benefits from pest management were not part of the equation. Fungicides are effective for management of diseases. However, in years with very little pest pressure – most likely from lack of moisture in 2012 – positive yield responses to fungicides are not consistent. 

 

 

Acknowledgements

 

We thank the ISU Research Farm personnel who assisted with application of treatments and Nate Bestor for helping assess disease severity.  Partially funded by the soybean checkoff from the Iowa Soybean Association.

 

 

Daren Mueller is an assistant professor in the Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology. He can be reached at 515-460-8000 or e-mail dsmuelle@iastate.edu. Stith Wiggs is a research associate in the plant pathology and microbiology department. He can be reached at 515-294-1741 or e-mail stithw@iastate.edu.

 


 



This article was published originally on 1/14/2013 The information contained within the article may or may not be up to date depending on when you are accessing the information.


Links to this material are strongly encouraged. This article may be republished without further permission if it is published as written and includes credit to the author, Integrated Crop Management News and Iowa State University Extension. Prior permission from the author is required if this article is republished in any other manner.